<p>I haven’t watched it and from what I read here I’m not going to.</p>
<p>A full ride based ONLY on talent. Hmmm. Unless every single one of the well over a dozen schools, closer to two dozen, that we looked at, (a wide range of private and public schools with a wide variety of programs, some very selective, others not as much, BA’s and BFA’s of all kinds, some very well known, some hidden gems, just to show how across the board is the sample I am basing my thoughts on) lied to us, full rides based only on talent/audition fall somewhere between never and never. Some did have pretty generous offers if they really liked you, so we heard, if they had the budget, and only one school we visited had that kind of budget for the program. And we did get a nice offer from them, higher than the schools who told us that they had a fairly small budget for talent offers. Now academic was a different story. It was entirely possible to get a full ride academically at almost any of the schools we visited, and then talent money would have been in addition. And actually - there were rumours floating about that some schools would SAY they didn’t have big talent monies but they would mysteriously find them for JUST the right person. I really hope that legend is as full of BS as it sounds, frankly.</p>
<p>Of course even though our sample was a pretty good representation of the spectrum of types of schools, it was obviously not every single MT program in the country, so it is entirely possible that some of them out there could be in a position to, and sometimes do, offer a full ride for talent only. </p>
<p>But frankly, with the plethora of amazing talent that every program regretfully turns away, I don’t see why any program would have any incentive to do that, because almost certainly they are going to be able to (in the desirable small capped audition programs especially) build the class they want to build without having to do that. And not to insult anyone but I don’t see how any one student out there could be SO AMAZINGLY FREAKINGLY unbelievably astonishingly SO much better by light years than the hundreds of other kids they see, that they all decide to break their own policy and utterly blow their budget on acquiring this ONE, only, super amazing, not even having enough money left to buy rights to good shows justifyingly brilliant kid. Not to say there aren’t superstars who shine even in a field of very shiny other stars…there are…but I think most schools probably find that the reality of budgets and the laws of supply and demand are such that it simply isn’t necessary for them to give that much money away in talent scholarships even to acquire those better than the best kids.</p>
<p>I could be wrong - and we did not visit any schools who would be in the category of rather bad schools who have decided they want to improve and are giving full rides away in order to do it, which would be the only feasible reason I could see a theater department deciding to do that. Other than, I suppose, a theater department having THAT much money that they could afford to do that for just really great kids that they do like a lot, as opposed to the unlikely and ridiculously exaggerated scenario I painted above. But I was under the impression that there aren’t any schools these days who have all the money in the world to spend on their wish lists - I was under the impression, that some colleges are doing not as bad as others and some are really really hurting, but none are exactly floating in extra monies, and giving full rides to kids who they can probably get for much less, doesn’t seem like something most of them are going to do.</p>
<p>So that’s what I conclude based on what we were told and saw. But as I say I didn’t see everything and I could be wrong.</p>