College Admissions Statistics Class of 2021: Early and Regular Decision Acceptance Rates

@sbballer Here’s the article about it, where the Stanford Dean of Admissions denied that it was a standard practice for Admissions to release the REA data to the public, even though the paper pointed out that it had in fact released the data for the last six years. It was an odd tiff to get into with the paper, and Admissions seems to be getting pushback from the campus which, as it turns out, likes to see the admissions data.

One could read this as a step backward in terms of transparency, or as an admirable move by Stanford to try to dampen the whole hypercompetitive atmosphere around college admissions, where students pore over the numbers trying to divine who has bragging rights as the hottest school in the country.

http://www.stanforddaily.com/2016/12/10/in-break-from-past-stanford-declines-to-release-early-admissions-data/

Johns Hopkins ED: 591 out of 1934 (30.6%)
http://hub.jhu.edu/2016/12/16/hopkins-early-decision-class-of-2021/

Adding Johns Hopkins:

MIT 657 out of 8394 (7.8%) (def=69.7%, rej=22.4%)
Harvard SCEA 938 out of 6473 (14.5%)
Princeton SCEA 770 out of 5003 (15.4%)
Yale 871 out of 5086 (17.1%) (def=52.7%, rej=28.6%)
Brown ED 695 out of 3170 (21.9%)(def=60%, rej=18%)
Penn ED 1354 out of 6147 (22.0%)=
Notre Dame REA 1470 out of 6020 (24.4%) (893 def=14.8%)
Duke ED 861 out of 3516 (24.5%)(def,671=19.1%)
Cornell ED ~1379 out of 5384 (25.6%)(def=20.9%, rej=53.5%)
Dartmouth ED 555 out of 1999 (27.8%)
Johns Hopkins ED 591 out of 1934 (30.6%)
Williams ED 257 out of 728 (35.3%)
University of Georgia EA 8059 out of 15,614 (51.6%)

Sorry, meant to say “EA”, not “RD” in my point #2 of post #79 above.

The official Princeton news release on the Early Action class adds a bit more color to the numbers, n.b., legacy and first gen.https://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S48/18/18I83/?section=topstories

@spayurpets The two most selective schools by a long shot in EA are MIT and Stanford. Personally I think it’s a step back. Transparency is always the better option.

Yes, I’m generally for transparency (maybe for my own selfish reason of wanting material for this thread). But I have never faulted schools that want to keep it under wraps, and it is especially altruistic for a school to not toot their own horn when they are on the top of the heap, if their reason for.not publicizing it is to benefit students. When selectivity becomes an end in itself and schools compete on that metric alone (“Let’s increase our applications so we can we reject more applications than Stanford does this year”) then it is counterproductive.

Any numbers on Rice yet? Got in, curious to see the numbers

re #23

That is outdated. This year the number of ED applicants was well over 900. The 2015 enrolled class had 748 applicants. So please remove that statistic until the College releases something current.

ref: https://barnard.edu/sites/default/files/cds_2015-2016_09-02-16.pdf pg 11

Georgetown University EA : 12% (“just under 12%”)
Last year : 13%

No denials, only deferrals.
Source : The Hoya Facebook

Anyone find more info on some LACs such as Haverford?

spayurpets only cares about th ivy leagues and top ten schools. Sadly

UGA is a top ten school?

Top 100 schools is what I meant to say

Any stats on Northwestern? Specifically how many students were deferred?

Tell me any other schools that may provide their stats, and I’m happy to add them, Top 100 or not. Haverford doesn’t usually announce their early statistics at all, and several LACs don’t. Middlebury, Amherst, Davidson and other small schools usually release their numbers, but they are lagging a bit this year.

Tulane released these data, but given the subject matter of this article they are probably mortified. You don’t usually find these stats in a NY Times article.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/us/tulane-college-applicants-acceptance-emails-wrong.html?_r=0

MIT 657 out of 8394 (7.8%) (def=69.7%, rej=22.4%)
Harvard SCEA 938 out of 6473 (14.5%)
Princeton SCEA 770 out of 5003 (15.4%)
Yale 871 out of 5086 (17.1%) (def=52.7%, rej=28.6%)
Brown ED 695 out of 3170 (21.9%)(def=60%, rej=18%)
Penn ED 1354 out of 6147 (22.0%)=
Notre Dame REA 1470 out of 6020 (24.4%) (893 def=14.8%)
Duke ED 861 out of 3516 (24.5%)(def,671=19.1%)
Cornell ED ~1379 out of 5384 (25.6%)(def=20.9%, rej=53.5%)
Dartmouth ED 555 out of 1999 (27.8%)
Tulane EA 6480 out of 22,256 (29.1%)
Johns Hopkins ED 591 out of 1934 (30.6%)
Williams ED 257 out of 728 (35.3%)
University of Georgia EA 8059 out of 15,614 (51.6%)

Sbjdorlo- i don’t have stats for this year, but Haverford does release the numbers. Have a look at this for past years (and keep in mind that the acceptance rate went down to 21% in the 2015 - 2016 admissions cycle).

https://www.haverford.edu/sites/default/files/Office/President/Factbook-Admission-Stats.pdf

Correcting for some typos:

MIT EA 657 out of 8394 (7.8%) (def=69.7%, rej=22.4%)
Harvard SCEA 938 out of 6473 (14.5%)
Princeton SCEA 770 out of 5003 (15.4%)
Yale SCEA 871 out of 5086 (17.1%) (def=52.7%, rej=28.6%)
Brown ED 695 out of 3170 (21.9%)(def=60%, rej=18%)
Penn ED 1354 out of 6147 (22.0%)
Notre Dame REA 1470 out of 6020 (24.4%) (893 def=14.8%)
Duke ED 861 out of 3516 (24.5%)(def,671=19.1%)
Cornell ED ~1379 out of 5384 (25.6%)(def=20.9%, rej=53.5%)
Dartmouth ED 555 out of 1999 (27.8%)
Tulane EA 6480 out of 22,256 (29.1%)
Johns Hopkins ED 591 out of 1934 (30.6%)
Williams ED 257 out of 728 (35.3%)
University of Georgia EA 8059 out of 15,614 (51.6%)