<p>We don’t collect that sort of information in that way internally. We could, but it’s not actually all that meaningful-- anything that would suggest that either GPA or SAT scores are adequate predictors of outcomes post-college is guaranteed to disappoint anyone looking to that data as an indicator for their child. Just like median SAT score is not an accurate predictor of your admissions result at a school, neither would GPA or SAT be an accurate predictor of what comes after, the exception being really law school and possibly med school, where that information is largely available as part of premed advising but largely unavailable to prospective students for good reason (it doesn’t mean anything to a prospective student that getting a 3.8 at Brown means you can get into pretty much any medical school because getting a 3.8 at Brown doesn’t mean anything to anybody who’s not a Brown student). More importantly, even with medical school these numbers, when looked at as averages, are devoid of significant information that really details how a school is doing or tells you anything about student outcome.</p>
<p>What you really should ask is what does that college view as its goals for undergraduates and what examples exist from people who have recently graduated demonstrating having reached those goals.</p>
<p>Is it more meaningful that 70% of students went straight to graduate school or that those who wanted to go to graduate school had no trouble being accepted wherever they wanted to be? One is a data point that tells you nothing of student population and nothing about the quality of programs attended or about why they would choose a program that one person may view as being of lesser quality. The other looks at how well a university facilitates students reaching the goals they set for themselves and the goals the university sets for them. None of that is measured in the data you’ve proposed or in any ranking system I’ve seen.</p>