<p>A number of fallacies here. </p>
<p>First, like it or not, there is a labor market. Illegal immigrants don't do jobs that others won't do. What they do is do jobs cheaper than legal citizens, depressing the entry level labor market by a considerable margin, and making it tougher for citizens to get a start, including many minority citizens. </p>
<p>And the do jobs that others won't do statement is hopelessly naive in terms of economics. The subsidy is passed on to employers - since when do those on the left support corporate welfare? And moreover, the viewpoint assumes there is some sort of national interest in having upper middle class people pay less for their lawn service ? Forget it - let wages rise without the influx of illegal labor. Don't encourage an underground economy. If there is less lawn service ordered, so be it - the well off don't need those subsidies. Neither does corporate America. Compete on a fair and rigorous basis. </p>
<p>And immigrants pay taxes? Maybe in some cases. But I have an experiment. Just suppose any of the middle class people posting here decide not to legally pay and file their income taxes. Give that a try, why don't you, and let me know how that works out, especially after consulting a criminal lawyer and having your freedom and liberty at stake?
So on what basis do we permit a second standard for illegal immigrants? Racist condescension? Respect for rule of law is the bedrock of our society - there are huge externalities for permitting illegal immigration as we have done. </p>
<p>Moreover, our immigration policies are a disaster for countries like Mexico. Most states act out of necessity - and take care of their people - including with social programs and the like. Not Mexico - with their inefficient and corrupt economy, they can freely continue not to take care of their people with their social program being illegal immigration to the US. Ah, great program, right? Remittances are now crashing. And condescendingly think Mexico is not capable of better? It is. It is not a poor country - with over 10k per capita - it is only good at acting like one. And just think - PEMEX - the corrupt state owned oil enterprise - lost money last year - at 140 bucks a barrel. Real skill that takes. But they can continue on their merry way as long as they can ship their social problems up north. My comments on Mexico are not new. Even the most liberal elements of the World Bank and IADB concur. It just is not for polite conversation among our politically correct environs. </p>
<p>Six billion people live on this earth. Over half want to come here. It cannot happen. We need immigration policies (like many other nations, including Western European nations) that value human capital and skills above all else. By the way, Mexico does the same and has some of the world's strictest immigration laws. </p>
<p>And finally, even if privately funded, I have severe doubts about the constitutionality of this community college program. And again, if some disagree, how about a private scholarship program that expressly excludes black and hispanic citizens? Isn't that what states did in the South under state sponsored segregationist laws? Or does that not apply to groups that do not fit the national origin or race victim of the month club? </p>
<p>In this context, the views I set forth are hardly extreme.</p>