<p>treefrog,</p>
<p>I wouldn’t be too sure that your campus doesn’t have an administrator whose job is wellness administration. I know that the large public U in our town has one whom I happen to be acquainted with. He is invisible to the students, but is in charge of setting policies with regards to things just like the talk you were given at your orientation. </p>
<p>Yes, I understand the issue from your position (I assume a non-drinker) of not being happy with the mixed message (don’t drink because you are not allowed to , but if you do so here is how to be responsible). It is the same message delivered here. </p>
<p>I’ve actually talked to him on the subject. His thinking on it is that with a mixed audience (drinkers, committed non-drinkers, and those who could go either way depending upon the social environment), he’d rather err on the side of having more kids drink, but with fewer incidents of alcohol poisoning (and potential death) because they are aware of what can go wrong in the party atmosphere. And (being in the south) there is a certain population that is offended by the position.</p>
<p>He looks at his job as a public health official, trying to minimize the worst of the damage from a social problem (substance abuse). I’m not taking a position on whether this is wrong or right, but just to let you know, it is a common way of handling things.</p>
<p>Now, I imagine if he could segregate his audience (drinkers, from non-drinkers, from ones who could go either way), he would deliver different messages to each. And while it would occur to most that you’d find the non-drinkers in a “substance-free” dorm where you could deliver a different message (and perhaps different social activities), in addition to the vast majority of non-drinkers, you will also find a significant population of the other 2 groups (drinkers, and those who could go either way) in a substance-free dorm. </p>
<p>Why do you ask? Unfortunately, some parents are either unaware of their children’s drinking status or are thinking that putting their drinker in a substance-free dorm, they will dry the kid out (not gonna happen). And there are parents who think putting their borderline (could go either way) kid in with the non-drinkers that it will keep them out of harm’s way (and sober) - not proven in my book. And unfortunately for universities, there is no star-chamber that you can put these kids in to filter out those who shouldn’t be in the substance-free dorm.</p>
<p>This being said, there isn’t a good reason why a different competing (with the drinking) culture developed in the substance-free dorms with different activities appealing to those who don’t need to drink fake beer to feel like they fit in. And there is no reason you shouldn’t promote those kinds of activities, marketing them to both the already sober and those who need a good reason not to be around the drinkers.</p>
<p>I think if you talk to the dorm folks about who developed the orientation talk about drinking, you should be directed to the person who deals with these policies on your campus. My guess is that you do have one there, but s/he is more of a policy person rather than an activities coordinator. That is who you need to find to start your effort.</p>
<p>And I think it is better that it is a student-driven effort. Students do know what types of activities are appealing to those who wish not to partake of the drinking culture. I think you will find a supporter in the administration official who decided on the “mixed message”, believe it or not. They really do want to support the non-drinking activities, but also don’t want to lose the vulnerable borderline kids by coming off as not understanding. You can serve a very useful purpose in the whole process. </p>
<p>Good luck!</p>