Columbia's Moment

<p>Over the past few days Columbia has seen a lot, heard a lot. But perhaps the two moments most representative of the Columbia's future are the opening of the new Northwest Corner Building and the announcement that the Supreme Court would not stand in the way of Columbia's expansion.</p>

<p>President Bollinger wrote something that I wish I could have such grace to write, and something I hope all of you enjoy reading. As I have said for sometime, it is often not so much that Columbia is great, but rather that it is emerging into a new moment in its history. Me and PrezBo have our differences, and I know I was a pain in the butt to him as an undergraduate, but in this I feel he hits the notes perfectly. Enjoy.</p>

<hr>

<p>Dear Members of the Columbia Community:</p>

<p>One hundred and fifteen years ago, in 1895, President Seth Low presided over a small ceremony on the new 17-acre campus known as Morningside Heights to lay the cornerstone of Low Library. He already had presciently observed that it might even take a century to build the last building. This past Friday, December 10, we dedicated that last building – an extraordinarily beautiful and gleaming structure, designed by the renowned Spanish architect Rafael Moneo, rising out of the northwest corner of the campus. Inside this thoroughly modern facility, some of our most eminent scientists and engineers will join together in interdisciplinary teams to explore new knowledge in such promising areas as nanoscience and biophysics.</p>

<p>This Northwest Corner Building is even more of a link within our University to the future than to the past. As it completes the internal area of Morningside Heights, one of the most profound and moving academic spaces on the planet, the building also looks toward our new 17-acre campus it has taken eight years to secure, five blocks to the north, known as Manhattanville in West Harlem. And there Columbia will, over the course of this century, fulfill its aspirations to be a center of research and learning and public service unparalleled in the world. Ground has been broken this fall on the first of our new buildings, the Jerome L. Greene Science Center. The Greene Science Center will house our interdisciplinary Mind Brain Behavior Initiative, led by our remarkable Tom Jessell and Nobel Prize-winning neuroscientists Eric Kandel and Richard Axel, and dedicated to exploring the sad mysteries of neurodegenerative disease as well as the most essential questions of human behavior, from the vantage point of virtually every academic discipline. The new campus will become the site for state-of-the-art buildings for Columbia’s Business School, School of the Arts, and School of International and Public Affairs. It also will provide a much-needed academic conference center. We have pledged to do this while creating an environment that is open to our local community and further enhances the mutual benefit we derive from a wide array of civic partnerships with the people, organizations, schools, and businesses of West Harlem.</p>

<p>As has always been the case, all physical changes to the University exist to serve the academic mission of adding knowledge to what human endeavor already has accumulated and transmitting this knowledge to each new generation. It is this belief in the importance of ideas, captured most powerfully every day in the classroom exchanges between professors and our students, that continues to define Columbia.</p>

<p>Columbia’s expansion of intellectual ambition and resources coincides with changes in the world that are placing more urgent demands on research and scholarship. With each passing year, layers of complexity are added to the challenges of poverty and ethnic tension, the environment and climate change, the economy and financial regulation, the study of infectious disease and other public health issues, and the desire for freedom of thought and creativity of the human spirit. The changes unfolding at Columbia ensure that we will continue to be a leader in shedding light on all of these subjects and others yet to emerge.</p>

<p>This bright future is made possible only through the engagement and support of our alumni. Our generous donors have now all but met the $4 billion goal of the Columbia Campaign – the largest in University history and the largest in higher education when announced in 2006. This has happened a year ahead of schedule and despite the burden on fundraising created by the global recession. In recognition of this extraordinary success and forward momentum, the Trustees last week decided to extend The Columbia Campaign until December 2013, and to raise the overall goal by $1 billion to a total of $5 billion, again making it the largest fundraising goal ever announced for a university campaign. It is not the time in Columbia’s history to lose any momentum.</p>

<p>Columbia now consistently ranks among the top universities in annual fundraising, a dramatic improvement from the early part of this decade. To honor this generosity, we have been committed to managing the institution with greater efficiency and have succeeded in achieving returns on our endowment investments over the past seven years at a rate that places us first among our Ivy League peers. A critical use of these resources has been to expand financial aid and enhance access to a Columbia College and School of Engineering education regardless of family income, producing one of the most socio-economically diverse and selective undergraduate student bodies in the nation and coming even closer to fulfilling the American promise that a young person’s educational opportunities should not depend on the wealth of his or her family.</p>

<p>There is nothing inevitable about the success of these efforts; we need the energies of all alumni, parents, and friends. Campaigns embody people's aspirations for an institution – their appreciation of its past, the impact it has had on their lives, and above all their confidence in its future. Fortunately, there is today an unmistakable sense of growing loyalty and enthusiasm in the extended Columbia community surpassing anything seen in several decades.</p>

<p>In many different ways, viewed from many different vantage points, this is indeed Columbia’s moment. For anyone who cares about creating new knowledge and conveying the knowledge we have to the next generation, as well as being engaged in the seemingly endless challenges facing our global society, there is no better place to be than here at Columbia. Ours is a unique community, situated in an extraordinary city, and committed simultaneously to open-minded reflection, spirited debate, and constructive action. I hope that wherever your own life’s journey takes you, you will continue to be a part of this institution and continue to support its valuable mission.</p>

<p>Sincerely,
Lee C. Bollinger
President, Columbia University</p>

<p>“Fortunately, there is today an unmistakable sense of growing loyalty and enthusiasm in the extended Columbia community surpassing anything seen in several decades.”</p>

<p>This is so true. Admissionsgeek, thanks for putting this up.! I couldnt agree more on how significant this time is in Columbia’s history. PrezBo is awesome, his speech really strikes a chord with every single person associated with Columbia in any possible way.
I couldnt be more proud to be a Columbian as of this moment.</p>

<p>It is not the time in Columbia’s history to lose any momentum.
Once again, perfectly put.</p>

<p>Over the last couple of years, perhaps because Columbia is now ranked 4th (and no matter what people say, being the college ranked right after HYP in US News draws you a lot of attention) and for a multitude of other reasons (Manhattanville, Obama etc etc), Columbia has been a major talking point. A lot of the times, people have been dismissive about Columbia’s potential to truly break the negative stereotypes people associate with it. Not comparable to HYPMS, lack of good athletics, red tape and bureaucracy lack of community, and even too small of a campus.
Like adgeek, as a student here, I believe these things are changing, and changing rapidly. Manhattanville is just symbolic of this evolution that the university is currently undergoing.</p>

<p>I wish I was a student when they completed the campus in Manhattanville so I could enjoy that too.! =(. </p>

<p>I believe this moment may very well mark the beginning of an era, when Columbia is once again crowned as the absolute best in the world :)</p>

<p>The rather surprising recent scandals will probably be a temporary blip on the radar, because it was the individuals and not the school who broke the law / made serious mistakes (unlike the Duke Lacrosse scandal).</p>

<p>Manhattanville if managed properly, should continue to elevate Columbia’s standing. As an alum, I’m optimistic that I bought an appreciating stock.</p>

<p>I got the email this afternoon, saw the subject line, and got a bit excited thinking it would be something about the juicy scandals of last week. Then I opened it up and it appeared to be a classically Bollingeresque self-fellating manifesto saying basically what OP said in a couple dozen words. I still haven’t worked up the energy to read the thing. Maybe I’ll read it on my blackberry the next time I’m on the bowl with a serious case of constipation.</p>

<p>columbia2002, that was uncalled for. Stop being a ******.</p>

<p>And yeah, I’m totally excited for the new building. As a ED admit, I been reading a lot/following Columbia over the past week. The recent series of scandals were pretty bad, but as confidential said, individual misdemeanors cannot be used to reflect the school as a whole. The vast amount of resources Columbia has, and its ever growing expansions will definitely put it among the top universities in the coming years. I hope it surpasses Yale next year <3</p>

<p>The scandals from two weeks ago aren’t really the center of campus gossip any more. They’ll get some mentions in tonight’s Orgo Night, but then they’ll fade right into the background in the consciousness of the undergraduate community. Of course, those personally affected by the drug bust will be living with it for quite a while longer, but life moves on for the rest of us. Manhattanville will be the institutional priority for Columbia for the next couple of decades; its scope cannot even be compared to what happened last week. It’s on par with moving the campus to Morningside Heights.</p>

<p>when does the manhattanville campus get completed again? and would the class of 2014 be able to enjoy/experience any of it?</p>

<p>jerome l. green science center is set to be complete in 2012, but most of the rest of the academic works for phase I wont be done until 2015, which probably means groundbreaking sometime in early 2012 (with the bathtub and other subterranean features starting next year). because the b-school has funding for its buildings, it may be able to finish earlier, done by 2014? SOA and SIPA need to get fundraising done for their own buildings, and will be close to the 2015 date (sometime).</p>

<p>phase II is a lot less clear, primarily it will just be sort of additional science initiatives and new housing units for grads/faculty (a lot is tbd). officially they list completion date by 2030. it is also land mostly on the northern end of the site, so it will fill in that campus. it will also include a rather nice park area that most people think will be the heart of the new campus. </p>

<p>if this fascinates you as much as it fascinates me…
[Manhattanville</a> in West Harlem](<a href=“http://www.neighbors.columbia.edu/pages/manplanning/proposed_plan/PhasedDevelopment.html]Manhattanville”>http://www.neighbors.columbia.edu/pages/manplanning/proposed_plan/PhasedDevelopment.html)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>You spend way too much time on cc to think people in the real world dismiss a Columbia degree… In terms of not being comparable to HYPMS, I would only say that would be in terms of $$$$. You look at any other measure, Columbia holds its own (particularly at the college level). Not too many universities can boasts the accolades that CU can…</p>

<p>^^
umm…thats what i was trying to say. the point i was trying to imply by saying its a negative stereotype is that its definitely not true. Ive always been a strong advocate of the fact that Columbia holds its own no matter what.
And Columbia has the third highest number of billionaires so yeah…even in terms of the money their grads make…its right up there.</p>

<p>I was referring to the size of their endowments, nothing else.</p>

<p>Columbia’s prestige and number of billionaires really comes from its graduate schools. It’s great to be associated with a university that produces significant bodies of research and produces rich alumni, but that doesn’t guarantee a good undergraduate experience (Harvard cough cough). It’s to be seen how Columbia is focusing its attention on the undergraduate experience and creating a cohesive Columbia community, something quite difficult in NYC. The limiting reagent for a campus tends to be space so the move to shift graduate schools up north is a good move for undergraduates. Hopefully, they’ll have the prescience to save some space for an actual student center. Hartley and Lerner are shameful.</p>

<p>

It already is among the top universities in the US and has been for quite some time. That being said, it’s pretty implausible that it will surpass Yale anytime soon.</p>

<p>^ and why not haha? Yale in my opinion is really empty. It just sounds nice, but the research, especially on the undergrad level, is not superior to that of Columbia at all.</p>

<p>Well what do you mean exactly by surpass? In terms of prestige? Academic strength? Name recognition/connections? </p>

<p>Your opinion of Yale isn’t grounded in anything factual and I don’t even know what you mean by “really empty”. As for undergrad research, I have no idea whether Yale is superior to Columbia, but if the only thing you’re looking for is undergrad research, there are much better options than either Yale or Columbia.</p>

<p>I’m quite certain that Yale surpasses Columbia in graduate research, and I think they’re about tied when it comes to graduate research (though they each excel in different areas). For graduate schools, Yale Law is the best in the country and I think Yale med slightly edges out Columbia. In terms of undergraduate experience, Yale’s is much…more cohesive than Columbia’s. Most would probably consider Yale’s better for that reason, but really they’re just very different animals. In terms of prestige, Yale is clearly greater than Columbia and probably greater than Princeton, though Princeton has a much more of a focus on undergraduates than Yale (or even Harvard). There’s a reason so many Supreme Court justices have done Princeton undergrad and then Yale Law.</p>

<p>If collegeftw is simply giving an opinion, then it’s completely subjective. In choosing where to go, it really only matters what he believes the ideal fit to be. But if he wants to more generally apply that opinion and assert that Yale is objectively inferior to Columbia, then he’s just full of ****.</p>

<p>pwoods - i don’t think that yale research is stronger than columbia. yale is not quite in the H,S,C,B league of universities that have as much strength across a range of departments. there are things that yale does well in (and at times surprisingly so, like forestry, drama and art), but they don’t have a serious engineering school, their natural sciences are ok, their econ has recently become a force, but wasn’t traditionally so. yale med as a school may be ranked higher, but the research and breadth of research is nowhere near columbia’s work. in the humanities - it is kind of where columbia was in the 80s, living off a few septuagenarians that were once known by something. in history, the discipline i know the best, yale is at times still considered the best program, but that is a creature of habit than a culture of producing truly innovative research. Yale SOM is good but probably rarely considered better than CBS, Yale doesn’t have a journalism school, it doesn’t have a fully-fledged international affairs school, it has good programs (but not top ranked) in public health, doesn’t have an education school. it makes up a lot for what it lacks in unique programs (its arts programs are pretty amazing, and sfes is a leader in environmental work), but it just isn’t as complete from start to finish the way columbia is.</p>

<p>i have argued for some time there are 4 complete universities out there - harvard, berkeley, columbia and stanford, and this is affirmed by most ratings out there like the NRC that ranks only those 4 in as many categories and as highly. they all have great arts & sciences, a fully-fledged engineering division, multiple highly ranked professional schools (including in lesser known professional areas). and amongst academic circles i would say those 4 are the ones that we would immediately identify as providing the most comprehensive university experiences. and as someone who does role in academic circles i don’t think this is from bias, so much as the reality. it isn’t to say the general public feels the same way, but they look toward prestige more than how comprehensive a university is. pick a random discipline and it is more likely that someone would reference HSCB than yale or princeton because the breadth of HCSB is so strong and their size and scope that much superior.</p>

<p>yale, upenn and princeton are unis that are fantastic at what they do, but there is quite a bit that they do not do, and in the case of penn there are some things they aren’t superlative at. (by my estimation, by the estimation of rankings, by general feel.) now, this isn’t to say that they aren’t fantastic universities, and indeed what they do is great. they just aren’t in the same league as HSCB.</p>

<p>there are also flagship state unis that i’d say are almost as close, but do suffer from not having the undergrad school that is considered out of this world. but uw-madison, umich, ucla are the other schools that approach being as complete as hscb.</p>

<p>then there is uchi and jhu that also suffer from the lack of breadth, but also have the problem of not having top rate undergraduate experiences (and in the case of uchi, yet). though they are superlative at everything they do, or so it seems.</p>

<p>now this isn’t tiering, it isn’t saying one is better than the other, but if we are to select which schools fully and truly represent the potential of a university, you wouldn’t include yale in that conversation.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>With the possible exception of Harvard College, it is clearly the most prestigous college, this could be said of any other university. I guess an argument could also be made that Princeton also is known primarily for its college. Also, as for Harvard, I believe most of their billionaires went to HBS. I am also not so convinced that the grad programs bring great prestige to CU as opposed to the other way around. Many of the grad schools rely on the college’s reputation. This is not the case with all the grad programs but definitely with some.</p>