<p>Random thought: I would find it very interesting to start up random bioethics threads to see you guys debate it out. It would be an interesting debate and would double as a very informative (for the most part) “article,” if you will, which would be quite resourceful.</p>
<p>You are welcome to start such threads. I don’t know how much debate will go on though. Otherwise I would recommend SDN which has many more people that are prone to get into such debates. The sociopolitical forum as well within SDN.</p>
<p>There are too many confounding variables. First of all, 2400s are rather easy to score. In my high school alone, there were 3 people in my grade and 5 people in the grade below who got 2400s. </p>
<p>Consider that premed is a self-selecting concentration. Most students who are getting below 2000 on their SATs are probably not going to do premed… Anyways, at a lot of schools premed students are weeded out and if you look at any college, the difference in enrollment between Chem or Bio 1 and then Orgo the year after supports that claim. </p>
<p>Though both tests are graded on a hard bell with 2400s and 40s representing the 99.9 percentile, because the SAT is administered to more underqualified students in comparison to the MCAT being administered to relatively qualified students seems to suggest that the MCAT is more competitive by several magnitudes.</p>