<p>according to princeton dictionary
slipshod= haphazard, marked by great carelessness </p>
<p>slip shot standards= careless standards? i dunno, it seems to be they were DILATORY because they didn't want to give him the money, not because they had careless standards</p>
<p>Yes, it was definitely dilatory. There was nothing about their actions that made it seem like they had slipshod standards. As someone above me noted, their actions made it seem like they had very exacting standards- definitely not slipshod.
But the fact that they were dillydalling on paying the guy showed that their actions were dilatory, or tending to delay or cause delay.</p>
<p>agree with reeya. they were meticulous about the compass, and if they were meticulous about it, they were "exacting" or the standards were in fact rigorously enforced, definetely not careless. they were trying to delay giving him the money , but the reason was never stated.</p>
<p>I did not put that, I put to Illustrating a preceding point (that a degree of privacy had to be given up, and that example just ILLUSTRATED it.). It was either THAT or to present a point of view that is about to be rejected. but that would be reading the next paragraph, because he in fact does reject that point. so Illustrating a preceding point is probably correct</p>
<p>no it said ( especially the Americans and asians. ) or something to that point- and i don't remember my answer to that one. i don't think that was the right answer though
was it the one talking about how native americans immigrated at the same time as another group?</p>
<p>*it might be just me but okay i don't remember getting the folklore passage, i think that was the experimental right.? dude hahaha i'm completely thinking about the wrong passages.</p>
<p>OH. The paranthetical remarks were in a sentence that was to emphasize something, the previous point in the preceding sentence. Didn't it say (Especially) inside the parathesis?</p>