<p>it was ominous</p>
<p>the others dont make sense rele</p>
<p>i said morbid</p>
<p>what did you say for degree?</p>
<p>I said measure</p>
<p>i said morbid
degree->calculate
DELIGHT!</p>
<p>but i think ominous is right... :(
Q is: delight or familarity? i chose delight b/c lullaby/dream they didn't want to wake up from</p>
<p>i think degree appeared twice.</p>
<p>i remember using calculate for an answer</p>
<p>i put familiarity b/c in that same sentence or the 1 b4, it mentioned how it was always the same thing she said</p>
<p>For the privacy passage, what did you guys get for the question about What best illustrates the main idea of both passage?</p>
<p>yeah i think i put pass 2 focuses on benfits</p>
<p>Ok cool, that's what I put. But I'm not sure because the one that says that "Both passages are critical of different institutions" seems pretty convincing</p>
<p>i think ours was right, i imed like 4 kids they said what we put</p>
<p>hey did u get calculated for discoveries of longtitude, i put invented but i might be wrong</p>
<p>i think i said passage 2 talks about benefits
some Qs</p>
<p>hard to maintain privacy?<br>
undermine privacy? is that a Q?</p>
<p>shrink/shrunk what Q was this? I don't recall...
lullaby/attitude toward stories DELIGHT?
tender=soft<br>
opinion passage1/2 2nd about benefits
analogy? privacy
importance of idea not mentioned parenthesis one</p>
<p>can anyone confirm if the above answers i got are correct?</p>
<p>therealzeta i got all of those i believe</p>
<p>"hey did u get calculated for discoveries of longtitude, i put invented but i might be wrong"</p>
<p>yeah, I put calculated. The sentence was like "Discovery of Longitude." I was about to put invented but I don't think longitude could be "invented" when everyone already knew it existed =/</p>
<p>Yeah, therealzeta, got all those too.</p>
<p>"there was one about an avant-garde director and the unconventional methods and the audience?"</p>
<p>I got confound....diminish</p>
<p>hipster thsi is from another thread. sorry to say but it wasnt. it was something like something unorthodox, im positive</p>
<p>this saT def was different.</p>
<p>i doubt there will be a compiled list any time soon</p>
<p>i went from thinking a 720 ish reading to like 650, i hated this dec sat it was so hard. except ritng was cake. watch me get liek a 800 combined....</p>
<p>well..wut do u guys usually get? if u get 750+ CR usually then i'd trust that what you got is correct, therefore what i got is also correct.</p>