@CateCAParent I totally get where you are coming from. Kids will play a sport from ages 5 to 18 and then…just…stop? Because it is ‘recruited athlete’ or nuthin?
Well, there are other options. And my S20 definitely placed the option of intramurals or club hockey very high on his list. (Because LOTS of colleges have ice rinks. Not.). He loves hockey, would play it hours a day if he could. But he’s also a strong student and wants to start with an engineering major, and they put the fear of God into aspiring engineering majors, so no way he will commit to anything which would jeopardize his doing well in school. The other two players have exactly the same attitude.
And I think all three of them could be an impact player in a weak D3 team. For one of them, pretty much any D3 team. He has gotten strong interest from a number of coaches, but none of the schools interest him. He doesn’t REALLY need an admissions boost since his SAT score is almost perfect and he has never seen a B on a report card. Sure, if he aspired to an Ivy or strong NESCAC school, he could leverage hockey to help get him here. But he doesn’t want to give that much to hockey at the outset. He too wants engineering and he knows it will be tough. Yes, many kids at rigorous schools play a sport and do fine. He wants to give academics his all, at least to begin with.
So, to your point…are this kid’s hockey playing days over because he wants to focus on academics initially when he goes to college? (Look how silly that question seems). Let’s say he feels secure at the end of his freshmen year and is ready to take on an activity. And hockey sounds like fun. How can the system make sure that this 6’ 3”, 220 lb defensemen who has a slap shot that broke the glass in the rink twice last year, end up someplace where he CAN play hockey? Eventually.
Maybe the system already does. Maybe hockey for a kid like that does impact admissions decisions? He, and my son, would never go through the recruitment process without the intent to play. But they almost certainly will want to play, eventually. Do colleges know that and hence lean towards athletes, even if not recruited?
(Readers, I do not want to suggest that I think it is remotely easy to get recruited for college hockey. It isn’t. And, yes, a year or two of juniors is the norm for almost all D3 slots now, and many D1 slots)’
I think kids like these 3 are the norm, not the exception. Most kids are not strong enough to play their sport in college. But many are, and for many reasons, don’t want to be a classic recruited athlete. Do they end up being admitted to colleges where they could play, despite that?