<p>Does anyone else fail to see the logic in [url=<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/23/business/yourmoney/23every.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5070&en=9a4efbdf117d51c8&ex=1131426000%5Dthese%5B/url">http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/23/business/yourmoney/23every.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5070&en=9a4efbdf117d51c8&ex=1131426000]these[/url</a>] [url=<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/business/yourmoney/06every.html?oref=login%5Dtwo%5B/url">http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/business/yourmoney/06every.html?oref=login]two[/url</a>] New York Times articles?</p>
<p>First he talks about how he loves Yale. Then he accuses Yale of being an investment bank. Then, in the second article, he switches tack and talks about how he gives alumni donations because he has such fond memories of the place.</p>
<p>But his historical reasons for giving money to Yale have nothing to do with his original question of whether or not the present Yale is a money-grubber.</p>
<p>Did someone press him to back down? Or did he just get weak-kneed at the last moment about criticizing his alma mater? In any case, it sort of dims my admiration of the place to think that a valedictorian of Yale's law school (although, as he repeatedly emphasizes, not because of his grades!) could earnestly write "I love Yale, and I am deeply grateful to Yale. It is a star in my sky every day and night."</p>