<p>
[quote]
So do salaries increase relative to the increase of school costs?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I think that BIG(f?)LAW salaries have kept up. For example, when I graduated Columbia 10 years ago, tuition was about half what it is now. Starting salaries for BIG(f?)LAW associates were about $85k. </p>
<p>The problem is that salaries for other legal jobs have not kept up. So it seems to me it's getting harder and harder to leave BIG(f?)LAW or avoid it altogether.</p>
<p>Also, if you go to a school where less than 80-90% of the graduates go on to BIG(f?)LAW, you are running a serious risk of ending up heavily in debt without that high paying job.</p>
<p>Almost the entire Class of 2006 responded and it turns out that 249 out of 349 will be working for a law firm. Of those 249, 191 will have jobs with Top 100 law firms. Is Top 100 considered big law?</p>
<p>Also, it says only 10 will be working for corporate law. What's the difference between corporate law and big law?</p>
<p>no, when they say "corporate" on that pie chart I believe they mean working for a company directly rather than at a firm. Some companies have their own lawyers instead of (or in addition to) hiring a firm to do their legal work. Another term for working at a company instead of a firm is "going in-house." </p>
<p>This is a somewhat unusual thing to do straight out of law school since most companies hire people with a few years of experience (since corporate legal departments are generally smaller and have less time and money to train people than firms do). But working in-house has a reputation for a somewhat better quality of life than working at a big firm.</p>