<p>@bhph11 nevermind I was thinking of the wrong passage. but my experimental section wasn’t about aquaculture. It was something about a writer</p>
<p>pluto passage was really similar to this
…</p>
<p>[Pluto</a> Still a Mystery 75 Years Later | Fox News](<a href=“http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,147483,00.html]Pluto”>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,147483,00.html)</p>
<p>Can someone make a ■■■■■■■ chatroom so we can communicate much faster. There isnt much traffic on the site now, so itll be much better. P.s. I’ve been trying but was not able to set up one.</p>
<p>Is it just me or was this test’s cr section harder than usual?</p>
<p>@Oscarlany I think I had that experimental. What was that passage about? I can’t seem to remember…</p>
<p>No CR was average to easy.</p>
<p>Does Math ever have -1 for an 800 or is it almost always 770-780?</p>
<p>Too easy this time to be 800.
It’s only happened like 4 times before.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the linguistic cr passage and it asked for the overall tone? It was like appreciative, ironic, uncertain, insincere…</p>
<p>i remember appreciative was an answer for a tone question, but I am not sure if it was this passage…did you get that?</p>
<p>Appreciative.</p>
<p>For the pluto one, was it an issue with reclassification or supporting it?
I put supporting, mainly because of “but,” and the author admitting that pluto was sort of like a satellite, but some people here seem to have different answers.</p>
<p>was the was the other choice besides outdated. i don’t think outdated is not correct because although it’s true that it is outdated, that doesn’t mean the other passage would say that it is outdated as the argument to whatever question it pertained to.</p>
<p>i got appreciative.</p>
<p>@mas1996 It was about the really pretentious writer who wrote about how he was different from yet so much more intelligent than everyone else. There was one question I wasn’t sure about on that section so I’m glad it was experimental.</p>
<p>And I also got appreciative.</p>
<p>Do you guys think a -2 will be an 800 this time? I’m pretty sure I got the loquacious/refractory question wrong (even though I’d memorized both words 
) and i put ostentation/humility which is apparently wrong. What about a -3 (which is -4)?</p>
<p>I got ironic for linguistic tone.</p>
<p>It specifically referenced back to first 3 lines of passage 2 and those lines were talking about how learning a language (though it seems really simple to us now) is actually harder than memorizing all the captals of all the nations around the world and one more extreme example of memorization. So I found this to be ironic. The fact that what we all acquire in our infant stage, such a simple thing that we regarded as a common sense, is actually a much harder task than things like memorizing all the capitals of 250 nations.
And how is this appreciative in any way.</p>
<p>The writer was especially appreciative of the mind’s capability for language. I thought that that was the point of the entire passage… As a rule of thumb, the word ironic is usually applied to circumstances that are somehow overtly contradictory in tone and subject manner, in thought and action, and so on.</p>
<p>Anyone remember this math question:</p>
<p>32, 16, k, 4</p>
<p>It asked what k was and the answer 8…</p>
<p>Yup! That was #1 I believe.
Does anyone remember the triangle with the ratio of the sides?
You were given the longest side and you were supposed to find the perimeter.</p>
<p>What was the ratio/longest side?</p>
<p>I feel really iffy about how I did. I just want the scores to be released so I can get it over with…</p>
<p>I think the longest side was like from 20-30. My memory is foggy though</p>