<p>can some1 plz attempt to re-write the question regarding art and females that had laud as the answer</p>
<p>I said fairness?</p>
<p>Can we not do tiny chat please? It to hard to keep with up plus I can’t use it because I’m on my iphone in a mcdonalds parking lot crying my eyes out because my chance for a 2400 and my dreams just flew out the window</p>
<p>journal one was definitely fair
objectivity combined with perspective basically is saying the hard facts when compared with your views…in other wise striving to relate a fair view that’s not too biased</p>
<p>I put fairness</p>
<p>@hellogloria I don’t remember that one</p>
<p>@tips1660 that’s what I thought at first but why would author 1 agree with 2 at all?? He seemed dead set on how comp programming was a great learning tool for kids</p>
<p>Lmao I’m glad you don’t reemember because I guess it’s my experimental xd</p>
<p>Passage 1’s author viewed 2’s argument as overly cautious right? Passage 1 asserted that children will definitely learn from programming and that they’ll become “more fluent in programming” or another language reference like that. So wouldn’t 1 think 2’s statement that we don’t know what they are learning is overly cautious?</p>
<p>Can someone possibly make a google doc to compile all the questions and answers? I would def help contribute</p>
<p>Did you all get 1/8 as the grid in for the rectangle with the shaded area</p>
<p>Anyone put abate…vigilance for the foxes question???</p>
<p>I put abate</p>
<p>Yup that’s right</p>
<p>I put abate vigilance for the sustainable animal population one.</p>
<p>What did you guys put for the computer programming question where it asked how passage 1 and 2 differed? The choices were like opinions, detailed anecdotes, etc. I put detailed anecdotes</p>
<p>I didn’t put overly cautious, I put regrettably true, since he argues that kids can only learn in the right conditions, and the second author is verifying his claim by saying how they need to monitor whether kids are learning the correct stuff. He also said that he didn’t like the new looking computers coming into schools, or something like that…</p>
<p>@uncbound16 no reason for him to be overly cautious either. As far as I recall author 1 was an experimenter. An experimenter by design shouldn’t find another qualification on his experiments results to be overly cautious</p>
<p>and yes, it was fairness</p>
<p>omg i reallyyyy dont want to retake again…</p>
<p>Does anyone know if the passage about Fauntleroy was variable? I found it somewhat difficult in comparison to the other reading sections</p>