December 2013 SAT thread

<p>there was no question about symmetry, it was just asking about the purpose of that paragraph i think</p>

<p>Hapton place was importance to author.
@summit somehinf about the Larry guy complaing about too perfect, btanch nodes, silliness, tones of a chaperones voice, the symettery if the place</p>

<p>4 could’ve worked for the median problem, right? Also, the question that had 1/27 for an answer was about a cube whose had a sum of its sides as 4, so each side was 1/3, so (1/3)^3=1/27</p>

<p>What was the one for the passage about fishing? “Fishing stats” one. Was it in sufficiently detailed or soemthinf</p>

<p>I had the experimental critical( one section had sphinx , the other had a picture of an illusionary duck ,and the third had 2 long paired about higher education) please can anyone tell which one was experimental !?</p>

<p>oh yeah, 4 would work too. Cokpletwly forgot about it. And yes weiyour…</p>

<p>the fishing one was insufficiently discriminating or something</p>

<p>What characterizes the fishing statistics? I put insufficietly discriminating</p>

<p>@m7md7…I had an extra reading, but NONE of my pasaages were the same as you</p>

<p>The semicircle one was definitely pi. Look at earlier posts for the work.
The token was 5.</p>

<p>The CR section was experimental one right? With the weird questions asking one to cite passage lines that support the previous question’s answer?</p>

<p>Yep, innsufficient since the small some fish plus large some fish in group together makes big fish extinct. Needs more splits in grouping.</p>

<p>What? Oh darn I put it can be easily manipulated but I was between that and discriminating</p>

<p>Oh okay thanks. Even though this is relatively irrelevant, for the math experimental grid in, there was a question about a parabola and the sum of the X values. It wasn’t shifted or anything, so I put 0 as the answer…but you can’t have the answer as 0 for a grid in… What did you all put?</p>

<p>you guys put brown was 30% right?</p>

<p>for the parabola it was 3
the line was y=x
so 3fx…i thought was 3=3x
and the value met up at x = 2</p>

<p>DRAT! I forgot tobturn degrees back into percents on the briwn one I think. I really hooe I did.</p>

<p>for the 995 didnt the numbers have to be different?? i put 986…</p>

<p>@dmj it wasn’t that one. Are you talking about g(x)=3f(x)?? I had one about a parabola and the sum of values</p>

<p>degrees to percent? im pretty sure it asked what percent…so if u write 30 you should be fine right?</p>