I write this from my phone, so please pardon the typos I’m sure it will have.
I think we all view the world, to at least some degree, through a lens of self-interest. And when people feel marginalized, for whatever reason (and whether “right” or “wrong”), it’s hard for emotions to not run high. The country is more culturally and socially divided than I have seen it in my lifetime, and for those who feel the most marginalized, I can imagine that it’s particularly difficult to hold back. And for what it’s worth, I don’t think either party has a monopoly on people who feel marginalized, though I believe the reasons for the feelings are often quite different.
In any event, I agree with others who have suggested that your conservative perspective, although apparently in the minority at your school, is valuable to the campus. But I would suggest that the perspective itself is signicantly less valuable than being able to critically analyze and articulate the bases for the perspective. You’re not going to convince anyone to meaningfully consider your positions with uncritical arguments, any more than uncritical arguments from those who espouse different views from yours will move you.
This brings me to your friend’s paper. As true for others on this board, I know nothing about its details. If I understand your description correctly, however, it sounds like your friend presented a counter-proposition but failed to directly address a principal argument of the other side that the instructor apparently expected to be addressed. Perhaps your friend’s statistics are entirely correct–I don’t claim to know–but what is the reason for the statistic? Does the statistic undercut or actually support the argument that the instructor apparently expected to be addressed? An argument that fails to squarely address the other side’s thesis does not strike me as a particularly strong, critical analysis. That said, I’m admittedly working with incomplete information, and I may have assumed too much.
In any event, I’m sorry you feel marginalized and attacked for views that appear to be in the minority on your campus. I’m sure it’s a difficult position to be in, especially at your age. I sincerely hope that your fellow students will listen to the reasoned analysis underlying your beliefs and try to see the world through your eyes. And I hope you will try to do the same in return. Just as you want a voice and acceptance on your campus, I think it’s likely that many of the people strongly espousing positions different than yours have felt marginalized, frustrated and/or attacked, or have known well others who have, long before coming to Exeter.
I hope you can all explore the reasons underlying each other’s perspectives and learn from them, but I’m not naive. Sadly, people too commonly reach a conclusion and advance a supporting narrative without meaningfuly considering the other side’s perspective or arguments, and self-reflection that challenges one’s long-held views is difficult. But I think that’s the goal, and I think it’s an admirable one.
With that, I’ll step off my soap box.