<p>gibby,</p>
<p>I read the article, but to me, it seems primarily to repeat the initial assertion without ever really exploring just who gets into the most selective schools.</p>
<p>Let’s reassess the poster’s question: “Do ‘regular’ kids get into Harvard?” The hidden premise of the question is “What is ‘regular’?” However, if the answer to the question is, kids with really high grades and SATs of 2200 or better, if these are “regular” kids, then yes, “regular” kids get into Harvard.</p>
<p>I look at my son and by this definition, he seems a regular kid. Besides pretty good grades (a few A-s, a couple of Bs over the course of four years), and phenomenal test scores the rest of his record looks positively pedestrian up against a lot of kids I saw get rejected last year. He had a handful of extracurriculars. Vice president of his school’s National Honor Society, captain of the quiz bowl team, a couple of other nice things. Selected for a number of school awards, valedictorian.</p>
<p>But nothing that 10,000 other kids who didn’t get accepted could lay claim to, or nearly so.</p>
<p>He stood out in languages - had a lot of years of Latin and Greek, multiple awards on the National Latin and Greek exams. The thing that may have been most distinguishing was that he finished his school’s Latin and Greek curriculum and then did independent study under the guidance of the classics teacher.</p>
<p>But how many kids run out of their high school’s math or science curriculum and need to go to the local college or do dual-enrollment? I don’t think that’s all that unusual.</p>
<p>He had good essays (I’d like to think EXTRAORDINARY essays, but then again, I’m his father ) and wonderful recommendations, but again, I bet a lot of “regular” kids (as they have been defined here) do, also.</p>
<p>My son won no Intels, no Siemens, no piano competitions, no national, regional or even state awards. Just a really smart, really dynamite, really fun kid who did what he liked, which was mainly read, learn and write.</p>
<p>So. What is the distinguishing feature or set of features? I don’t think that Harvard tells folks.</p>
<p>Why? Because then kids will try to mold themselves to appear to have this attribute. And it’s not real if you’re trying. So they’re not going to tell, and they’re never going to tell. They may not even verbalize it to themselves, for fear of it becoming formalized and reified. </p>
<p>But yeah, whatever it is, even “regular” kids with 2300 SATs and 3.9 GPAs - but no USAMOs, no 501c(3) charities founded, no books-being-made-into-major-motion-pictures published - can have it.</p>