<p>The Columbia app only has 1 essay question and ridiculously short "short answers"; in addition, the collegeboard reports that its emphasis on ECs was "important" as opposed to "very important". Does this signal that Columbia values scores over ECs compared with other Ivies?</p>
<p>They’re both very important. The application is efficient; they don’t have to require a 3 page resume to care about your ECs. And who cares what the college board says?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Considering it has one of the lowest median SAT scores AND one of the lowest acceptance rates of the Ivy League, it’s doubtful.</p>
<p>Quoting from Columbia’s official FAQ:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I remember talking to a couple of ppl (one from Canada, one from NY) who were admitted to CC, and neither had astonishing test marks… would personal character & drive to learn, then, be a very important quality?</p>
<p>Would a drive to learn be an important quality if we actually failed in trying to learn? I really want to learn but I’m not able to…Will the adcoms, in their infinite mercy, still extend their grace to me?</p>
<p>Still a results-based business, musil. which is why the grinds sitting in Butler library till 3am on a saturday are found in greater quantity than the pot smokers at the Hungarian pastry shop - a fact I find regrettable but understandable.</p>