Does ED hurt chances of merit scholarship at Mudd?

<p>Presumably HMC offers merit scholarships such as the Harvey S. Mudd Merit Award and President's Scholars Program in part to lure strong applicants who might otherwise choose to attend Caltech or MIT. If this is true, then it seems logical that applying ED would hurt chances of receiving these awards, as in that case HMC has a lock on the applicant, so there is no reason for them to offer further incentives.</p>

<p>Is this how it works in practice, or are these awards based entirely on a candidate's strength (top X% of aggregate applicant pool) and the other criteria documented for the awards? Does anyone have experience applying ED and receiving merit aid from HMC? Are stats available anywhere showing the distribution of merit aid for ED vs RD apps?</p>

<p>Thanks!</p>

<p>I can’t tell you about the overall distribution, but my son applied ED and was awarded the Harvey Mudd Merit Award. Good luck.</p>

<p>Thanks, sunnyholiday. Did your son receive notice of the merit award with the ED acceptance letter, or later, when the RD acceptances were finalized? Also, did you apply for financial aid as well – I’ve heard that the merit awards can “fall through the cracks” when there is no need-based award.</p>

<p>Has anyone else applied ED to HMC and received the President’s Scholars Program Award?</p>

<p>Thanks again.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I believe there may be some truth to this. So be vigilant.</p>

<p>I can’t find the Harvey Mudd Merit award letter and I don’t trust my memory re the timing. Sorry. My son did not apply for the President’s Award.</p>

<p>My son wanted to apply ED II to Mudd if he was rejected by his EA school but he didn’t because he will be applying for the Presidential Scholars Award as he does need significant aid to attend. He’s already done with his app. though, except for the app for the scholarship.</p>

<p>Mine applied ED and got the National Merit award. He didn’t apply for any other merit aid. I think merit award letters come after RD acceptances.</p>

<p>Back when the Merit award was based off of strict SAT/ACT and class rank qualifications, it was awarded automatically, so applying ED was in no way disadvantageous.</p>

<p>Now that they’ve removed the objective criteria, it’s hard not to believe that the merit award is being used to up the yield rate, which would imply that they’re stingier with it during ED. If you’re a strong candidate for the merit award based off of the old criteria, then you shouldn’t have much trouble being accepted to Mudd. Might as well go through the regular decision process and compare financial/merit aid packages. </p>

<p>As for how applying ED affects the President’s scholarships
 I don’t really know. Look at the committee in charge of awarding them. If the committee is free of admissions office people, then no one will know who’s locked in to ED and who isn’t. If there are admissions people on the committee, then it WILL influence the process, even if no one brings it up in committee discussions.</p>

<p>I believe that part (but not all) of the reason for the change had to do with class rank issues. My son, for example, went to a very small, very rigorous high school. Top 10% of the graduating class was , at most, 4 people. And, they didn’t calculate rank.
Nevertheless, I find esquiar’s reasoning quite sound.</p>

<p>What were the old objective criteria for the merit awards?
Thanks,</p>

1 Like

<p>I think it was basically SAT scores (maybe ACT as well) and rank. Mostly I can only remember that my son was a likely qualifier except for rank since , as noted, his school (like many private schools) didn’t calculate rank. (And they really , really didn’t. Kids there take college courses and it was considered hopeless to try to come up with a reasonable weighting system. ) Mudd still gives money to all NM finalists.</p>

<p>Thanks NeMom. I guess I was wondering if my son might someday be a match for Mudd. He is on track to be top 5% with the hardest classes (APs but not Universiity level) and hopefully SATs will get over 2200. His school is offering a great education but no science fair or science olympiad. They are starting to look at me funny
but then again they haven’t sent anyone to CalTech or MIT or Mudd or Olin
they are new andd small. How much should I worry about the hook? It the picture as bleak for ORM as is painted in ‘What High School Don’t tell You?’
Sorry for the threadjack.</p>

<p>ParentSparkle:
I found the “old” criteria for the Harvey Mudd Award (that they don’t use any more):</p>

<p>Harvey Mudd College Merit Award: $10,000 per year for four years to students who meet all five of the following criteria; ACT English score 32 or up, ACT Reading score 32 or up, ACT Math 34 or up, SAT Math II 750 or up, High School rank top 10%. [For ED must take ACT by October of Senior Yr.]</p>

<p>I’m sorry I have only the ACT info, not the SAT info, because that’s what our high school uses, so that’s all I wrote down. But the original info included both SAT and ACT of course. </p>

<p>[Although FYI Harvey Mudd was one of the last colleges to agree to use ACT as well as SAT scores for admission.]</p>

<p>Thanks Sunny - I used a conversion table and came up with Writing 720,CR 710, and Math 755. If those conversions are correct, I think my son is capable of getting those scores if he puts the time in, so if he gets the Merit Aid or not, it’s reassuring to know that he could be a good match he sticks on the path he is on.</p>

<p>I think those conversion scores are about right. I think , ParentSparkle, your son is definitely in the range for Mudd in terms of scores and such. Mudd does understand that not all kids have access to APs/college courses/etc.</p>

<p>Thanks NeMom
good to know that Mudd understands
getting tired of paddeling upsteam</p>