<p>Duke has the standout biological anthropology program along elite universities, particularly if you are interested in primatology. </p>
<p>It’s one of the smaller departments when one looks at Duke as a whole, being dwarfed by econ/poli sci/pub pol, but it is one of the larger science departments. I believe it is second only to biology in size, with chemistry, physics, and EOS trailing behind. The intro course enrolls about 90 people, but it is by far the largest. Lower level courses usually have 20-30 students, and most of the seminars have 10 or fewer students.</p>
<p>There are three primary strengths within the department - primate ecology, primate/human anatomy, and primate/human evolution. Courses offered include primate sexuality, human anatomy (with dissection of cadavers), primate conservation, human evolution, etc.</p>
<p>The facilities and resources are absolutely superb. It’s housed in the new French Science Center, and the department has, with the possible exception of Michigan, the largest collection of primate fossils and skeletal remains of any American university. The two professors working on primate and hominid paleontology have been inducted into the National Academy of the Sciences, and they regularly teach undergraduates. </p>
<p>The primate center is also fantastic and has many species that otherwise aren’t found outside Madagascar. Several courses use this resource extensively, and you’ll learn how to tag and sample primates, monitor behavior, etc. If you volunteer there, which is encouraged, you’ll also learn how to feed and care for them.</p>
<p>[Duke</a> University | Evolutionary Anthropology: Home](<a href=“http://evolutionaryanthropology.duke.edu/]Duke”>http://evolutionaryanthropology.duke.edu/)
[Duke</a> Lemur Center](<a href=“http://lemur.duke.edu/]Duke”>http://lemur.duke.edu/)</p>
<p>As whenhen indicated, Emory is decent. Other good schools for biological anthro are Harvard, Yale, and NYU among private universities and Michigan and Wisconsin among publics. Going down a few notches in selectivity, there’s GWU and - if you happen to live in one of these states - Penn State, Arizona, and Stony Brook. </p>
<p>I disagree with whenhen’s suggestion of Chicago; it is certainly good for sociocultural and archaeological anthro, but its biological anthropology offerings and faculty are virtually nonexistent. As far as I know, most LACs have few or no offerings in biological anthropology. </p>
<p>One can’t assume that a college with a general reputation for anthro has adequate offerings in biological anthropology; many departments focus mainly or entirely on sociocultural anthropology. The same goes for biology, if your interest is ecology – many otherwise good biology programs at universities like JHU, MIT, CMU, Brandeis, etc. have decidedly weak offerings in ecology and organismal biology. </p>
<p>Addressing your question about Cornell, biology is superb, as you noted. Glancing over the anthro faculty, it seems okay though not great – two biological anthropologists on staff. If you’re a New York resident, it might be a good idea to apply to Cornell CALS; you can double major in the arts & sciences, it’s a bit easier to get into, and it’s cheaper.</p>