<p>I guess I am a dissenter here. I don’t think double-majoring is an especially good idea at all, absent some special circumstances (which aren’t that uncommon).</p>
<p>Very few college majors actually qualify a student for anything. (I’m not talking about nursing or engineering here. I’m talking about the kind of majors the OP wants.) For me, the point of a major is to give your studies focus, and also to ensure that a student has at least a glimpse of what depth means in a field, and how you go about obtaining it. You don’t need to do that twice to do it well, and doing it twice doesn’t double the value of the experience (or anything even close to that).</p>
<p>Now, a student’s college course work – which is certainly related to, but by no means the same as, the student’s major(s) – also provides a base of mainly introductory knowledge in some broad fields, that the student expects to build on with employment and graduate studies. And obviously, the student should choose his or her course work with an eye to what sort of building he or she may want to do. But I don’t think you have to slap every thing you study with a label like “major” or “minor”. And to some extent accumulating those labels can get in the way of building a more eclectic curriculum that allows for a bit of personal exploration, not to mention choosing some courses because they are valuable in and of themselves rather than as part of the requirements for a major or minor. It’s the rare major or minor that doesn’t have some absolute duds as requirements; why should one volunteer for more of those than necessary?</p>
<p>If you can go to medical school and become a doctor without majoring in biology, chemistry, or something related shows that what major you have actually has little importance in many common, significant circumstances.</p>
<p>There seem to be three reasons why students love double majors. First they think it gives them a leg up with employers. I doubt that. That’s not to say that, for example, environmental management coursework might not be a valuable addition for a geology major, but the additional oomph that the double major supplies is negligible. (And, sorry, as an employer I would be seriously turned off by a kid whose resume showed a double major and four minors.) Second, I think it’s a continuation of the attitude that leads high schoolers to accumulate 14 APs. It’s coup-counting, and it’s not respectable. And finally I think many students see a double major as an expression of their individuality, and a rebellion against the narrowing of focus that college otherwise requires. “I’m not just an X major. I’m an X and Y major!” That’s fine, but it’s also not something I respect. Having one major doesn’t make you a boring person, or a person with only one interest. And I would rather see you do one major well than two majors at the bare minimum.</p>
<p>Where double majoring requires an extension of college, and extra tuition – that makes it really, really hard to justify. In general, it’s not valuable, but it’s not all that harmful, either. When you start spending (and borrowing!) extra money to do it, then it’s harmful, too.</p>
<p>A few exceptions I recognize, at least as long as they don’t make you spend a lot of extra money: (1) You have substantial interest in an area, and because of preferential registration for majors you wouldn’t have access to the best courses without declaring the additional major. (2) You change your mind about what you want to do after substantially completing major 1, and major 1 is of a sort that might lead people interested in major 2 not to take you seriously unless you get the full major 2 credential. This is especially believable if one of them is something like Feminist Studies or Theater or Basket Weaving, and the other is Economics or Physics. In either direction. This happened to my wife – she was two classes shy of completing her Psychology major when she decided she would rather do American Studies. It wasn’t hard to complete the Psychology major, and it didn’t get in the way of American Studies. (Interestingly, after not using either in the workplace for close to 20 years, for the past 10 years or so she has been in positions where her Psychology background was actually useful. But not so much the major.)</p>