<p>Several of the top-ranked US universities have a structurally different application or admission process for engineering, or for some of the programs in science. A few examples are listed below. Are there more?</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Duke (as of the early 2000's) used different formulas to combine the test scores of engineering applicants, and a different admission procedure where a faculty committee from the engineering school was involved. </p></li>
<li><p>Brown has an application supplement for engineering and a faculty committee from the engineering departments (<a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/brown-university/1337547-brown-engineering-impact-admit-chances.html%5B/url%5D">http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/brown-university/1337547-brown-engineering-impact-admit-chances.html</a>)</p></li>
<li><p>Brown has a bachelors+MD direct admission program (PLME).</p></li>
<li><p>Cornell's engineering school has its own admission process.</p></li>
<li><p>Columbia SEAS is a different admissions track from Columbia College. (May</a> I apply to both Columbia College and Columbia Engineering? | Columbia University Office of Undergraduate Admissions)</p></li>
</ul>
<p>-UC Berkeley has a separate college of engineering and admissions are subject to limits on particular "impacted" majors which usually include some of the engineering subjects. I don't know whether the COE has a distinct admission or application process otherwise.</p>
<p>My understanding is that Harvard and Yale have relatively uniform admission procedures where any effect on admission of a choice of major is informal. Applicants could be compared to others with similar interests, and there may be annual limits/quotas/targets for enrollment in particular subjects, but there is no separate information required of engineering applicants, and no separated admission track or officially different weighing of test scores.</p>
<p>Any data on other schools, or correction of the preceding, would be appreciated. Thanks.</p>