<p>on their ROTC ban. Main</a> Street - WSJ.com</p>
<p>Ironic how the president of Columbia, Lee Bollinger, states it's because of the Dept of Defense's "Don't Ask; Don't Tell" policy, yet it is not a policy, it is a US law enacted by Congress.</p>
<p>With such liberalism dominating one of the "foremost" schools for journalism, it's no wonder our alleged unbiased journalists are as believeable as the Iranian president</p>
<p>"Even Obama Does Not Agree w/Columbia"</p>
<p>you mean: even Columbia does not agree with Obama :p.</p>
<p>The ROTC ban is not in any way unique to columbia, it also isn't a ban, we're allowing them to speak on campus and advocate for the ROTC they just can't use our campus facilities. </p>
<p>"Ironic how the president of Columbia, Lee Bollinger, states it's because of the Dept of Defense's "Don't Ask; Don't Tell" policy, yet it is not a policy, it is a US law enacted by Congress."</p>
<p>Columbia disagrees with this law and its practical implication. Who enacted it is completely inconsequential.</p>
<p>"With such liberalism dominating one of the "foremost" schools for journalism, it's no wonder our alleged unbiased journalists are as believeable as the Iranian president"</p>
<p>who thinks journalists are as believable as Ahmadinejad? maybe in Iran this is the case, and that would be a triumph for us, if our journalists are put on the same level of credibility as their president.</p>
<p>DADT is a stupid policy. Whether it is a significant enough to prevent ROTC from using our campus is debatable. I think it isn't significant enough to prevent them. Bollinger disagrees, he's allowed to, there isn't a clear winning answer.</p>
<p>Skraylor: HAHAHAHAHAA. You're funny</p>
<p>Bukkaboom: You're bitter. Did Columbia reject you?</p>
<p>Obama had to say that he disagreed with the Columbia policy. He needs to win the election. I'm sure he thinks otherwise in reality.</p>