Legislative leaders (Senate President and House Speaker) met with the Florida Board of Governors on Thursday. They key takeaway is that Negron and Corcoran have already worked out a deal, with each supporting the others key educational initiatives. That means the Bright Future changes will likely be permanent, plus the low level BF will likely be increased in value.
That’s very different from last year, when they did NOT get along. I also don’t see how the Governor can veto BF changes this year, especially since it looks like he’s running for the Senate.
By the way, here are UF’s legislative priorities for this year:
UF wants to continue it’s hiring spree, and decreasing it’s student to faculty ratio. The new, massive Data Science building would (last time I saw an update) be located/replace the large parking lot in front of the bookstore.
However, unlike the Senate, the House did not include the Bright Futures increase in its budget proposal, raising questions about its funding.
“The policy we agree on, but the policy is not going to go anywhere unless we have the dollars to support it,” Galvano said.
“In this budget we will be recommending that we start slowing that growth,” he said. “The intent is to reduce operating funds, and thereby entice colleges to spend some of their fund balances.”
Michael Brawer, executive director and chief executive of the Association of Florida Colleges, said he disagreed that higher education should be used to balance the state’s budget.
“I really don’t have much to say about the House budget,” he said. “We’re starting in a hole, again.”
"And it looks like Corcoran doesn’t want to take the risk of passing a budget that funds public schools without guaranteeing he’ll get his boost for private-school vouchers as well. "
The House did not include Bright Futures increase in budget. Corcoran may be holding BF hostage until gets agreement on voucher spending. fyi. The second tier funding is the most expensive, more qualify for the Medallion level so moving from 50% to 75% of tuition is more challenging to fund.