<p>Seems to me if my friend took the class, has his exam in hand, (handed back in class, not stolen or anything) and offers to share it with me so I could have an idea what this classes tests looked like I'd jump on it. I would not consider this cheating because the prof handed it back and shouldn't be giving out the same exam for the next four years. Some tutoring centers even keep old exams on hand for students to work with.</p>
<p>OK, if the tutoring center gives it out this means they had explicit approval from the prof. They have contacted the prof prior to receiving the keys and said hey, well make this available for the entire student body unlike your friend who is handing you the exam. Nobody cares in the administration that the professor makes his exams same year after year. No one will chide a prof for it if it is discovered. However, if someone finds out you had a key which is like 30% of the current exam, guess who theyll go after? You. So it is your job to make sure you are not cheating. Prior to taking those keys from a friend, if they havent been posted online or given out at tutoring center, you have to contact the prof and ask if it is ok. It is your responsibility to do it.</p>
<p>Also, ConanFan, I get this feeling that if you were caught in this situation, accepting a past exam from a friend, not contacting the prof, and then realizing exams are very similar, that you would justify yourself later and not go to the prof and ask for another exam. Youd tell yourself that it is the profs fault because the prof made the exam same or very similar causing you to cheat accidentally. But you will have the moral obligation to go and tell the prof about what happened, right? Accidental or not, it would still be cheating. So to save yourself from this trouble. It takes just a few seconds to send the prof an e-mail and ask if past material that wasnt made widely available is fair game prior to exam.</p>
<p>Anyway, I just got the weirdest feeling reading your post that you are very skeptical that students can do extremely great work on their own maybe even over and above others.</p>
<p>There are very big differences in submitted material between students who are exceptionally bright and those who are cheating and therefore appear bright. Someone else pmed me about it and I dont want to explain it over and over again. I mean if you think about it yourself (imagine youre a TA) what is the greatest difference between the two groups? Needless to say that everyone I caught admitted to cheating right away, except that one guy in my other post. So with my methods I never accused anyone who was just plain bright. But with that one guy even the prof and other TAs agreed with me on my conclusion.</p>
<p>Oh yeah... and I comletely agree that your telling that student the final didn't matter was BS and very unprofessional.</p>
<p>I told him the truth about final. It was only 17% of total points, as was stated in the syllabus. Usually final exams are worth 50% or even more. Everyone was made aware of that. I told him he shouldnt worry about it as I told all of my A students and therefore treated him no differently. You can accuse a TA of being unprofessional only if this TA treats some students differently based on factors other than academics, such as personal dislike, gender, or race. The fact that I never disclosed to him that I knew he was cheating and most likely not prepared is not any of the above. It was my way of getting back at him without treating him differently from all the other students.</p>