<p>New Ranking of Billionaire University. </p>
<h1>1 : Harvard</h1>
<h1>2 : Stanford</h1>
<h1>3 : Columbia</h1>
<p>In</a> Pictures: Billionaire Universities - 3. Columbia University - Forbes.com</p>
<p>New Ranking of Billionaire University. </p>
<h1>1 : Harvard</h1>
<h1>2 : Stanford</h1>
<h1>3 : Columbia</h1>
<p>In</a> Pictures: Billionaire Universities - 3. Columbia University - Forbes.com</p>
<p>Full Ranking:</p>
<ol>
<li>Harvard</li>
<li>Stanford</li>
<li>Columbia</li>
<li>Penn</li>
<li>Yale</li>
<li>Chicago</li>
<li>MIT</li>
<li>NYU/Northwestern</li>
<li>Cornell/Princeton/Berkeley/USC</li>
</ol>
<p>The concentration of wealth in so few, as in billionaires, is detrimental to society, overall. Specifically to the poor. For when so few have so much, it becomes impossible for so many to have just enough. So producing many billionaires doesn’t seem to be a positive thing, for any school on the list.</p>
<p>^^ I agree, I really wouldn’t rank a school on how many billionaires they pop out. I love Columbia because of its promising and very broad range of academics, not to mention the opportunity to find a life long passion. For that, I don’t need the money if i’m very happy with my career and choice.</p>