<p>Wow! I can’t believe this thread is still going! The success of a college is more than just SATs, but you cling to points like it was the ultimate proof of superiority!. You Nova folks are loyal, I will give you that much!</p>
<p>Brave Ulysses wrote: "I truly believe that the statistical examination of the entire student bodies shows that Villanova has a demonstrable advantage of academic strength of student body and success while enrolled. Test scores , HS GPA , Student retention , College graduation rates , student faculty ratio , etc should give Villanova an edge for those that have to make a choice between Villanova and Fordham and have not given a clear edge to either based on other personal factors such as, majors, social setting , location , finances.</p>
<p>If you want to go to Fordham great , have a terrific time , it’s a very good school but the student body as a whole at Villanova has a better record of achievement at High School and at College."</p>
<p>Really? Even if I give you this much, then by this measure the ultimate success of a college (not high school) is the outcome when one graduates, i.e. how many successful graduates come out of a school because you can have a few more points going in, but if you don’t accomplish much when you get out, what was the point?</p>
<p>I challange you to look at the list of (famous) alumni of Villanova vs. those from Fordham (found on the Wiki sites). If you can be honest with yourselves, there are much more listed from the school that admits kids “with less points” than the one with “more points”.</p>
<p>When all is said and done, THAT is the test of how good an education was…what is the outcome, the results if you will, not the points it took to get in, of the school. Cling to your points all you want, the true proof is in the outcomes.</p>