<p>My friend's stats:</p>
<p>Female from Alabama
GPA: 4.4 W (full IB diploma/hardest possible classes)
RANK: 2/361
SCORES: 800M 740V</p>
<p>Countless awards and many areas of involvement.<br>
--National Merit Finalist
--AP Scholar w/ Distinction
--Hospital volunteering
--Piano awards
--Science research this summer in Boston.
--Mu Alpha Theta president
--Multicultural Club president
--Student Outreach for Religious Diversity founder and president</p>
<p>APPLIED TO: top schools such as Emory, Duke, HYP, MIT (2 sibs go there), Caltech, Columbia SEAS, as well as safeties</p>
<p>OKAY, here's the situation. My friend, who from the stats is extremely qualified, did not get into her top schools and right now, her situation isn't looking that great. As her friend, I've been trying to make sense of her admissions decisions as to why she did not get into at least one of her schools. </p>
<p>For Caltech and MIT: She did not take physics, which from what I heard is "strongly recommended" for applicants. She put down her major as "bioengineering." Could this have hurt her since she didn't take physics? ALSO, isn't it easier for girls to get into MIT and Caltech? Not that many girls are salutatorians w/ 1540s. Also, I should mention that she has two siblings at MIT and also had a great interview w/ them.</p>
<p>Columbia SEAS: Less selective than Caltech and MIT, so I thought her chances here were better. Her interviewer even said that she was great and that he hoped that she'd "choose Columbia over the other great schools she got into."</p>
<p>HYP: Of course, a crapshoot. These were for her, as well as for most everyone, a high reach.</p>
<p>Emory: I got in w/ a 4.01. She has a 4.4. There obviously had to be something wrong.</p>
<p>Duke: Many people from my school applied. But two candidates who were less qualified than my friend (one was a URM) both got in.</p>
<p>This leaves my head spinning and my friend w/o many options for next year. As we were trying to grasp at what could've possibly denied her her acceptances, we couldn't come to many strong conclusions. She had great grades, test scores, activities, essays, and teacher recs. And then we realized it--the school report. </p>
<p>Her counselor had mailed in much of her stuff late. Also, her brother asked around at MIT and said she did not have a great GC report. But the death blow came when a friend accidently found her school report (done by another school official).</p>
<p>This school report was horrible. In the Common App area where most school officials write a letter of rec for the student, this official had written two small paragraphs that basically said the student was only good at academics and was a disappointment to her teachers. This official also said that my friend gave her everything late, so she couldn't write an thorough report. Also, her checkmarks were not that high. And also, for the "how much do you endorse this candidate for admissions" the official put, "fairly strongly."</p>
<p>Her recommendation did not testify to the strengths of my friend at all. Everyone who knows her--teachers and students alike--know her to be hard-working and full of personality. I am starting to think that this school official did this partly to decrease my friend's chances b/c the school official has a "favorite" student to whom she had written AMAZING rec letters for and this "favorite" student was applying to many of my friend's schools (and she had lower grades/scores).</p>
<p>What are my friend's options? Taking a gap year is out of the question. I've suggested going to a school that's offering her great merit aid and then transferring, but is there ANY WAY to get back at the school official who did this to her? I mean, one that doesn't involve car paint and eggs...?</p>
<p>HELP.</p>