<p>SB27,</p>
<p>Your post is so full of untruths that I wonder if either you or your kids were rejected from Stanford or something?</p>
<p>(A) Let's start with the first lie, shall we? You said: "[Stanford] is a great school, but not any greater than Vanderbilt."</p>
<p>Well, Stanford has smarter students, smarter faculty, better academics, higher selectivity, higher prestige and a bigger endowment. Any rankings, surveys and admissions data will verify this. Seriously, Stanford makes Vanderbilt look like Middle Tennessee State.</p>
<p>(B) "The student bodies are becoming less distinguishable."</p>
<p>How so? Stanford is much more selective than Vanderbilt can ever dream to be. Stanford's acceptance rate is less than half that of Vanderbilt; its yield rate is almost twice as high. Despite trying to lure students from Stanford (and MIT and HYP, etc.) with "merit" $$$, Vanderbilt's yield rate is still an abysmal THIRTY-SIX percent. Even though Vanderbilt bribes (more than one in seven) admitted students with $$$ and locks some up via not one but TWO Early Decision programs, almost two-thirds of admittees choose to enroll elsewhere. So who are left at Vanderbilt? A lot of bottom feeders who couldn't even get into Duke.</p>
<p>(C) "Stanford used to be more diverse." </p>
<p>What a ridiculous and completely unsubstantiated statement! Among top 25 schools, Stanford enrolls the highest percentage of underrepresented minorities. Also, Stanford has made a concerted effort to increase socioeconomic diversity on campus. Not only does Stanford offer one of the most generous financial packages in the country, but also it founded Questbridge, which is a program that identifies and matches academically talented low-income students with elite colleges.</p>
<p>(D) "[Vanderbilt's] engineering school is very good." </p>
<p>Actually, according to USNWR, Vanderbilt's engineering school is ranked #42 in the country. Meanwhile, Stanford boasts one of the two best engineering schools in the world. As an indicator of the gap between the two schools, Stanford faculty includes 136 National Academy of Sciences members, while Vanderbilt has only five. NAS memberships is one of the highest honors accorded to scientists and engineers. No kidding, compare to what Stanford engineers are doing, Vanderbilt engineers look like they're playing with L3gos.</p>
<p>The OP also mentioned an interest in economics. Stanford's economics department is one of the three or four most distinguished in the country. Several of Stanford's Nobel Prize winners teach economics. Speaking of Nobel Laureates, Stanford currently has 16 on its campus Vanderbilt? NONE!</p>
<p>(E) "Fully 40% of Stanford GSB grads do not have a job waiting for them in May/June this year."</p>
<p>Since we've been discussing the two respective undergraduate institutions, I don't know how this is relevant. But let's run with it anyway. I doubt that the statement is not an exaggeration. But if it were true, then graduates of Vanderbilt's (Owen) business school, with its #44 ranking and THIRTY-SIX percent acceptance rate, must be panhandling on the streets of Nashville.</p>