<p>It sounds like your son is going to have no trouble at all with Cost of Attendance, considering that you can already afford to pay your calculated EFC. MANY people cannot. Most people think their EFCs are fairly unattainable, it seems to me. I know I cannot afford mine. (But wait … You said you were “financially struggling.” So maybe I’m missing something. It sounds to me like you might have enough savings to afford his college, if your EFC matches about what you can afford. If that’s the case, then you may still be “financially struggling” when he goes to college, but you won’t be struggling any more than you already are.)</p>
<p>Add the fact that your son’s stats are so high to the fact that you think you can afford your EFC, and I think you are going to have very little trouble putting him through college!</p>
<p>Anyway, I said this in the preceding post:
To expound with m2ck’s examples:
</p>
<p>*(First of all, I think m2ck – who really knows her stuff – meant something like “published price of attendance” in the two examples above, versus COA.</p>
<p>In my little world (I think in many people’s worlds), COA is typically thought of as an individual’s “personal” Cost of Attendance. After all scholarships and need-based grants are taken into account (all ‘free’ money), how much will it cost ME to attend?</p>
<p>If a school charges, say, $40k to attend, and you have $10k in merit awards and $10k in need-based grants, your personal COA for that school is now $20k. Whether it’s in the form of debt (ie, student loans or parent loans), or savings, or whatever’s in your grandmother’s cupboard, it’s going to cost you $20k to attend. Your COA for that school is $20k.</p>
<p>That’s typically what’s meant by COA, I think – what a college will cost YOU to attend after doing the math on each individual financial aid award. In the end, you and your child will compare all COA’s to determine which college is the cheapest. It could be, as it was in some of my kids’ cases, that a $50k school is ultimately as cheap, or cheaper, than a $25k school, after taking all merit and need-based awards into account!)*</p>
<p>So, with that particular concept of COA established …</p>
<p>If a college’s advertised price of attendance is $55k and your son earns a $25k merit scholarship, then his COA has just been reduced to $30k. Whether your son’s EFC is $50k, $20k, or $10k, the price of that school has now been reduced to $30k, at the most, for that son. If your son earns $45k in merit aid for that $55k school, your son’s COA has now been reduced to $10k max.</p>
<p>Then, after merit awards are taken off the top, your EFC determines how much need-based aid may be awarded.</p>
<p>Published Price=$55k
Merit Award=$25k
EFC=$50k</p>
<p>Your COA will be $55k - $25k = $30k. And you’re done. That’s what that school will cost you, because your EFC is $50k, and you owe “only” $30k. Merit scholarships come off the top. You owe less than your EFC. COA=$30k.</p>
<p>Next example, same fictitious school, same merit award …</p>
<p>Published Price=$55k
Merit Award=$25k
EFC=$20k</p>
<p>Your COA will be $55k - $25k = $30k, AND you can expect $10k in need-based grants (free money) from most schools (assuming they compute a similar EFC and they “meet need”). Your EFC is $20k; you supposedly owe $30k; so they’ll likely grant $10k. Now, your COA for that same school is $20k! (That’s why m2ck said that merit aid won’t necessarily reduce your EFC.) If the school doesn’t grant the $10k (they either don’t “meet need,” or they disagree with the FAFSA’s EFC), then you’ll owe upwards to $30k. COA=$20k, up to $30k.</p>
<p>Last example, same fictitious school, same merit award …</p>
<p>Published Price=$55k
Merit Award=$25k
EFC=$10k</p>
<p>Your COA will be $55k - $25k = $30k, AND you can expect $20k in need-based grants (free money) from most schools (if they meet 100% need and agree with the FAFSA EFC). Your EFC is $10k; you supposedly owe $30k; so you’ll likely get $20k in need-based, non-loan aid. COA=$10k, or up to $30k, depending on how the college interprets your need. (Likely much closer to $10k in this example.)</p>
<p>If we consider a larger merit award …</p>
<p>Published price=$55k
Merit Award=$45k
EFC=$50k
Your son’s COA in this case would be $10k.</p>
<p>If EFC=$20k, your son’s COA would be $10k.
If EFC=$10k, your son’s COA would be $10k.</p>
<p>So, YES … merit awards CAN eat into EFC. For sure. They often do, in our experience.</p>
<p>THEN, after all that, your son will be offered the standard Stafford loans, and he can use those to pay for a portion of his COA. Freshman year (unless they increase them, as proposed), he’ll get $5500 in Stafford loans. That $5500 will help pay his COA – in other words, it will come off of the $30k, $20k, or $10k COAs in the above examples. If your son accepts the loan, your non-debt costs will be $24.5k, 14.5k, or 4.5k out-of-pocket that first year. That’s what you’ll have to be able to afford, if you’re willing to allow your son to accumulate the “national-average college debt” over 4 years. </p>
<p>I hope this helps! The way we think of it, and have experienced it, merit awards DO greatly reduce a college’s published price, no matter what. They also eat into FAFSA EFC’s. Lower EFC’s help a student “earn” more grant money, if the EFC has not been already been met by merit awards.</p>
<p>Wishing you the best! :)</p>