<p>Go to Page 34 and look at the comparison of average GPA’s at GT vs. peer institutions: <a href=“http://www.irp.gatech.edu/sites/www.irp.gatech.edu/files/GradeInflation2003.PDF[/url]”>http://www.irp.gatech.edu/sites/www.irp.gatech.edu/files/GradeInflation2003.PDF</a> While Tech has a lower average GPA than schools like Florida, UNC, and Washington, it’s on par with Purdue and Texas A&M. So if your goal is an engineering MS, you have the same chance of a high GPA at GT vs. any other first tier engineering school. The advantage you have over a Florida or Texas A&M is that GT is a Top 5 school while those are Top 20 schools. GT also has more research funding that all of the schools mentioned above, so there is more opportunity for engineering research, especially in BME. As far as MS programs at MIT and Stanford, those are peer institutions for GT, so quite a few students go there for MS and PhD’s. </p>
<p>GT has a reputation for being a “weed out school” and for giving low GPA’s because of the 1980’s. During that decade, there was significant political pressure on GT to admit in-state students, even if they were unqualified. So GT lowered it’s admission standards, admitted those students, those students performed poorly lowering the GPA, then ultimately dropped out. Since then, GT has increased it’s admission standards such that the students admitted can handle the courses. As a result, the retention rate is now excellent, and the GPA is consistent with peer institutions. </p>
<p>That said, a technical major GPA (where something around a 3.0 is average) will never be comparable to a liberal arts GPA (where something around a 3.5 is average). This is because liberal arts grading is much more subjective than technical grading. And when a professor is allowed to grade subjectively she tends to push grades higher than if the grading is done objectively (few people like handing out D’s and F’s if it’s avoidable). You can see this at GT, where just about 35% of undergraduate Engineering grades are A’s but 61+% of undergraduate Architecture grades are A’s. </p>
<p>And, obviously, your GPA will be impact by the overall quality of the school. If you go to GT and are of average intelligence and work ethic compared to the GT student body, you’ll earn an average GPA (probably just over a 3.0). That same student at Clemson will be of above average intelligence and above average work ethic relative to the Clemson student body and will earn a higher GPA (a 3.5 or so, most likely). </p>
<p>So, in reality, your decision isn’t GT vs. another school to control GPA, it’s Engineering vs. non-engineering and Top Tier School vs. Lower Tier School. If you want the best chance at a 4.0, go to Kennesaw State and major in Chemistry. If you want the most impressive resume at the expense of GPA, go to GT and major in Biomedical Engineering. Do Med Schools take the quality of school and major into consideration when comparing students? Absolutely. Do they consider it enough to balance out the inevitable lower GPA? You might want to ask a pre-med or pre-health adviser about that. It will be specific to certain med schools and they would know better.</p>