<p>Hey guys i got into George Washington and UC Davis. My major is Enviornmental Science, and my interests involves Enviornmental Science and Policy and I would also like to get a degree in a foundation science like Biology or Phsyics (that still remains uncertain.)Maybe like double major in Enviornmental Policy and Biology or something. But In your guys's opionion, if the schools costed the same, what do you guys think would be the beter decision. I do want to go to grad school, so keep that in mind too. I would like to get your opinions.</p>
<p>This is easy. 10 years from today if you want to settle in Eastcoast go to GW
If you refer California West, go to UC Davis</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Very true. And determining where you want to live 10 years from now will depend on where you want to WORK 10 years from now.</p>
<p>For example, if you know you want to work for the EPA (going along the lines of the Environmental Policy route), then using GW’s locational advantage might yield better prospects for exposure to that agency than UCD. On the other hand, UCD is well known for it’s Environmental/Agricultural Sciences and you can try to work for CalEPA. Orrrr, what you could try to do is focus more on the Environmental Policy in DC for undergrad and then do one of UCD’s graduate Environmental Science programs. That way you might make some decent contacts in the Capitol for possible job prospects later AND you get UCD’s signature programs and be in a state with some of the most strenuous environmental policy laws, and take part in shaping the future of that possibly.</p>
<p>I would be forced to inquire if cost is a factor and if you’re a California resident. If cost is a factor and you’re a CA resident, then UCD would definitely be the better deal - doing both undergrad and grad there won’t wholly hurt your chances at working in DC and you may eventually be able to gain enough work experience to vie for competitive jobs there anyways.</p>