<p>As others have said, The Hoya can often fall prey to a bit of sensationalism.</p>
<p>Right now I have a Macro Econ TA who’s a junior (he taught as a sophomore). I’ll admit, when asked about Economics that extend beyond whatever we’re studying, his answers are a bit suspect. But really, a lot of what we’re doing in recitations isn’t rocket science - calculating the CPI, defining what makes up GDP, etc. It’s not especially easy work, but if you know it, you know it. My professor always stays for questions after class anyway, so it’s not like you don’t have other resources.</p>
<p>And it’s important to note that Econ is probably the only department I’m aware of that has to rely on undergrads to TA. While it may be a sub-optimal configuration, it’s only one department, in only a handful of introductory level classes, for only some sections, with high-achieving undergrads. You could do a lot worse.</p>
<p>As to your other concerns:</p>
<p>Yes, the library is ugly. Doesn’t mean the books inside are less useful, or the databases less accessible. (Also: they’re currently drawing up plans to renovate and/or expand the library. The exterior will still be mostly the same though)</p>
<p>Re: Science Classes: I have a lot of friends who are science majors and/or pre-med, and I really haven’t heard any complaints about the teaching. The only complaints I’ve heard are that it’s really hard and time-consuming - but you’re going to get that anywhere for pre-med.</p>
<p>If you wold like to see what student concerns are, seeing the platform of the candidates running for president might be helpful: [GUSA</a> Hopefuls Vie for Pres., VP | The Hoya](<a href=“http://www.thehoya.com/node/17901]GUSA”>http://www.thehoya.com/node/17901) . Most complaints are, relatively speaking, minor. More wireless hotspots. Better transportation to basketball games. More recycling.</p>
<p>That being said, a few concerns are a bit more substantial. Safety pops up more than once. On face, this concern looks rather discouraging. Personally, I don’t think safety is really much of a concern, and I’ve never felt unsafe around here, but I recognize others may not feel the same way. However, the main issue that seems to be of concern is expanding saferides coverage. This is a service that is used to pick up students late at night from areas somewhere around Georgetown, but not on campus. I think the fact that people’s main concern about safety is off-campus says something. </p>
<p>The other substantial concern is the career center. More than one person mentioned expanding it. While I disagree with those that say the career center needs to do a better job of helping students find out where they want to go in life (to me, this seems one of it’s strengths), the criticism that it focuses a bit much on MSB is widely held and not unjustified. It’s true that a large proportion of the recruiters that come to campus represent the financial industry. But in terms of the counseling they offer, they have specialists in multiple disciplines, and the best practices of a job search don’t vary all that much from field to field (that is, you should have a good resume whether you work in politics or business, even if the format of the resume differs slightly), and I haven’t had any complaints with the career center in my search for a non-business internship.</p>