<p>I heard a rumor that Duke is Goldman's #1 recruited school. Is this true?</p>
<p>No. 27 is recruited from Wharton alone (without Upenn College). That I believe is the largest one.</p>
<p>yea, duke's not even close. don;t believe their bragging.</p>
<p>thanx.... well in that case, do you know how heavily recruited they are in the finance field?</p>
<p>They are recruited well. Just not the #1 place.</p>
<p>Brown is highy recruited.</p>
<p>I know this question has been asked several times, but does anyone have any info. regarding ibank recruitment for SAS (statistics of anecdotal)? Are these students able to join the whartonites during the OCR? Do they get top offers (i.e. GS, ML, MS, CB)?</p>
<p>ihateCA: I heard that as well, however to my knowledge, they don't have any data to confirm top ibank placement. Or do they?</p>
<p>I don't have any data. I'm just speculating.</p>
<p>Chicago's definitely highly recruited, as well as Stern, Wharton, Michigan and other ivies.</p>
<p>Would it make sense to choose Chicago over Stern if a person if planning to enter ibanking. Do you know which ibanks recruit at UChicago?</p>
<p>IBANKING:
1. Wharton (duh)
2. Stern
3. Ivies=Chicago
4. Schools like Michigan and Indiana U
5. The rest</p>
<p>SALES/TRADING:
1. Wharton (duh)
2. Chicago
3. Ivies=Stern
5. Schools like Michigan
6. The rest</p>
<p>If you plan on entering i-banking Stern is a better choice than UChicago. Produces more bankers than any other school in the country and is known for its foray in the i-banking sector. if you are sure of your choice to go into banking, it would be an easy choice, Stern.</p>
<p>It produces more bankers because everyone wants to be a banker there. Chicago and Stern is more or less in the same footing in terms of getting through the door. </p>
<p>As for trading, that is very different as much of it (particularly as everything is becoming more quantitative) depends on the individuals skill rather than with a school's pedigree. A Wharton and Chicago student would be in the same footing (as would any Ivy, M, S, etc school graduate).</p>
<p>mahras2: S as in Stern, M as in Michigan?</p>
<p>M=MIT, S=Stanford</p>
<p>IHateCA, I really doubt Stern is better than Harvard for banking. Stern may send more people into banking, but it is behind Harvard most definitely. Likewise with Yale and Princeton.</p>
<p>I'm talking about in terms of recruiting.</p>
<p>You think Stern is recruited more than Harvard? Heh.</p>
<p>In terms of recruiting, HYP would be better than Stern. The reason you might see a numbers difference is easily because Harvard isn't a school simply for kids intent on going into Wall Street, so it's only going to be a percentage of their students who seek banking jobs. </p>
<p>BB's recruit at a number of top schools but when it comes down to it, if you want to determine which school is better than the other, you have to look at other factors, specifically where elite boutiques are recruiting from. Why? Because these elite boutiques are small and may only accept 10-15 kids a year as a whole, versus the larger numbers that go into BBs. So those 10-15 kids have to be the best of the best. Now if you bother to go onto Lazard's website, you'll see that they don't even bother visiting Stern. That tells you something.</p>
<p>Fine, then don't just sit there. Correct it. I don't claim to be correct in everything I say. Do I need a disclaimer and a team of lawyers to explain that to you every time I post?</p>
<p>Since you're all at my throat every time I say something remotely inaccurate, I'm putting in a disclaimer before the contents of my post:
<em>INFORMATION IN THIS POST DEEMED ACCURATE BUT NOT NECESSARILY CORRECT. SO THEREFORE IF I SAY SOMETHING WRONG, DON'T SLIT MY THROAT. JUST CORRECT IT, AND I'LL STAND CORRECTED.</em></p>
<p>IBANKING:
1. Wharton (duh)
2. Ivies
3. Stern/Chicago
4. Schools like Michigan and Indiana U
5. The rest</p>
<p>SALES/TRADING:
1. Wharton (duh)
2. Ivies/Chicago
3. Stern
4. The rest.</p>
<p>Thank you for not slitting my throat.</p>