<p>IHateCa, I'd say that Wharton is in a league of its own, followed by the Ivies, Michigan, UVA, Stern, Chicago, Duke, MIT, Stanford and Northwestern.</p>
<p>how can you categorize all the ivy schools together? schools like dartmouth are probably not stronger than chicago/stern for ibanking?</p>
<p>Did I miss something? What's with the defensiveness?</p>
<p>Did you guys read the disclaimer at the top of my post?!?!?!!?!? I even capitalized the whole thing for you. And since none of you read it, here it goes again:</p>
<p><em>INFORMATION IN POST #20 DEEMED ACCURATE BUT NOT NECESSARILY CORRECT. SO THEREFORE IF I SAY SOMETHING WRONG, DON'T SLIT MY THROAT. JUST CORRECT IT, AND I'LL STAND CORRECTED.</em></p>
<p>It really ****es me off when people just question my post and do nothing about it. Is it that hard to copy/paste and correct it if it's wrong?</p>
<p>I agree with Alexandre's list...</p>
<p>I was at a speech by Goldman's CEO last year (here at wharton) and during his speech he stated that Wharton is GS's #1 recruiting school and that wharton also has the largest representation among GS's MDs.</p>
<p>One important fact to consider is how many people at a given school are interested in i-banking and then weigh that with the number taken from a school by a company. At Wharton, everyone wants to do that stuff, so there's a lot bigger number of people recruited. However, at Harvard, there are a bunch of people wanting to do academia, law, etc, that won't be interested in financial services. </p>
<p>Individual success rates in getting these jobs is what's most important, I would think.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>HYP</p></li>
<li><p>Wharton</p></li>
<li><p>Everyone else</p></li>
</ol>
<p>What about west coast schools like Berkeley, Stanford, UCLA</p>