<p>Hey guys, yes, academics and how the shcool suits u are prolly the most important aspects when looking at colleges, but girls are important too. Yes they are. And when Im talkin about nice girls, I mean girls that you would be willin to date. Can somebody with authority please rank these institutions with regard how nice their girls are? </p>
<p>in no particular order</p>
<p>columbia
brown
U of Mich
UC berk
upenn
princeton
wash U in St. Louis
Rice
harvard
rice
UVA</p>
<p>please dont tell me you are judging schools by how other people say how nice the girls are....</p>
<p>yes I'm...to look at colleges, you have to look at every aspect, not just academics, dorms, food, social life</p>
<p>I would think all schools have girls that are willing to date. I mean, the best way to probably look for those girls is to avoid party schools, but even then, in party schools you'll see girls who are willing to date.</p>
<p>If your really taking that into account, then maybe check out http://**************.com/guides<em>by</em>rankings.asp/10 ?</p>
<p>edit: huh... its blocking the words "college *******" for some reason... ? I dont get it...</p>
<p>UVA has some fine women...</p>
<p>Nobody here has attended more than one or two schools and will be able to rank something like that.</p>
<p>Try spacing out the word it's editing.Get creative with it so that the uncensored word shows. No reason why it should be editing a link like that if the word isn't a curse.</p>
<p>we washu sweeties are waaaay hot.</p>
<p>actually, really, i have no idea, but i'd say that we're a pretty cute student population</p>
<p>dude yea...WashU girls are hawt.</p>
<p>he means to say c o l l e g e p r o w l e r.com</p>
<p>Damn carnegie melon is at the bottom of the list. are the girls there that bad looking?</p>
<p>Noone could possibly have gone to any of those schools and formed an adequate assessment of the "girl" situationto do any sort of comparison. What you will get, of course, is rumors and gossip.</p>
<p>I don't think it's really a matter of comparing one school's girls to another school's. It's more of whether there are an abundant amount of good looking girls at your school or not. So I'm guessing that those that ranked really low on that list just don't have that many good looking girls.</p>
<p>Quick story. A friend of mine goes to Stevens Institute of Tech. Naturally you figure the male/female ratio is much in favor of boys. He says its like a 70% male and 30% female. But in reality of those 30% only like 10% are good looking. And that's only when he's drunk. Everytime I hear him complain about it it's so funny. I mean it's so bad there that he finds himself going to the city to actually meet girls from other schools like NYU or FIT. He tells me that's where the girls are at.</p>
<p>When will people learn that nobody can objectively measure something like that because they're only seeing their own school.</p>
<p>Check out the College Prow ler rankings. They have a website.</p>
<p>Haha all the colleges I want to apply to are Cs, is there some kind of inverse relationship between the schools academic rigor and the hotness of the girls?</p>
<p>you are a huge tool...(to the person who started this thread)</p>
<p>Actually Corroborator, yes there is.</p>
<p>haha my school is third on that college p r o w l e r list A+</p>
<p>My high school would have been #1 on a list of high schools.</p>
<p>to the OP.. just the fact that you posted this highlights a major problem in ur personlity.. no school would help u date more... its college, if u want better chances to get girls go to an LAC thats in the middle of nowhere, dont judge on a school by school basis</p>