<p>Why are there soooo many threads based on which schools have the best looking women? I've seen like one, maybe 2 topics on hottest guys in this past year that I've been browsing through CC. I don't get it. I'm not saying I don't consider looks important but seriously it's starting to make me think that despite what guys claim (that personality, humor, kindness matters) is all complete bull. I guess it's time to hit up the plastic surgeon if I wanna land any decent guys in college. Just kidding, I guess. But seriously, again I KNOW that girls (myself included) are shallow when it comes to looks too, but the number of best looking girl threads I've come across is insane. Whatever...</p>
<p>Thats because its a bunch of guys who never been near a girl and they all want to ask stupid questions.</p>
<p>wait, who ever said "personality, humor, kindness matters"? for guys OR girls?</p>
<p>I hear Allison Stokke goes to berkeley, looks like I have until November 30 to finish the app</p>
<p>why are there so many of these posts? we should consolidate them or something.</p>
<p>Feikuai,personality, humour and kindess do matter. I am a guy and I believe those are important things. However, not in college. Like most guys we just want to score with the hottest girls in college. After college is when we get serious. But scoring is signicant cause otherwise we will wonder about other girls when in commited relationships</p>
<p>I agree with collegehopeful78. High school and college are the 'fun' years, and if you don't get wild and dirty then, you will probably never have the chance again.</p>
<p>Because asking "Which school has girls with the best personalities?" would be ridiculous. Aspects like personality and interests are based almost entirely on personal taste, whereas looks, at least within a single culture, are judged pretty similarly. Thus, it's easier to categorize schools as having "hot" students in general. As for the less tangible qualities like humor and personality, there are plenty of threads that address this very topic. They're just much more personalized. "Are students at school x too preppy?", "Which of these schools has a more laidback student body?", etc. </p>
<p>There is, of course, still some variation in what people consider physically attractive. For example, most of these lists include a bunch of southern schools where the girls are blond, super-tan, and wear a lot of makeup...which I think looks gross.</p>
<p>OP, you just have to realize that guys hit their sexual peak around 17-early 20s. The guys about to go to college, or that are in college, are going to have chicks on their minds all of the time. Girls, on the other hand, have other questions to ask because they aren't as concerned with the opposite sex; which is why you see the unequal distribution of threads.</p>
<p>And for what it's worth, it isn't all about looks. I have no reason to lie on here, to try to make you or any other girl feel better. It isn't complete BS when guys say that humour, intelligence, and other aspects of personality are important. Hell, a bad personality can make a hot chick pretty unattractive, and a good personality can really bump a less good looking chick up. The thing is that most guys, myself included, will only settle so low when it comes to appearance. Women are usually the same way, though.</p>
<p>because people want an easy hot girlfriend</p>
<p>There's a correlation between hotness and dumbness since hot people don't have to work as hard to get by, so a place that only has good-looking people is most likely to be filled with airheads of both sexes. You'd then be less motivated to study because of their stupidity and also because of being obsessed with trying to get laid, and you'll get s hitty grades.</p>
<p>this thread makes me nauseas.
thank goodness i don't have a p*nis and am free to think solely with my brain.
poor all of you who, due to the chromosomes handed to you by biology, spend large quantities of your formative years thinking about "scoring" with some spray-tanned airhead with too much mascara. i'm sorry.</p>
<p>Well, LAC, you know that isn't entirely true. Women are pretty powerless to their emotions a lot of the time. </p>
<p>But I do partially agree with you. I can't stand chicks that over-tan or wear too much makeup.</p>
<p>bah!
i used to be a victim of my emotions. i learned to control them. i am as cold and stony as a a chunk of hornfels. the only thing that makes me upset is college admissions.
it's all about the self-control. i learned to regulate my emotions and suddenly became an A student.
until i had to fill out all these darned college applications, that is.
so if i'm hornfels, then college applications, which can cut through me, must be diamonds. blood diamonds, mined by poor overworked fingers.
don't worry, i'm not emotional right now. just sleepy.
final word: women, regulate your emotions! men, chop off your reproductive organs!
the end.</p>
<p>At least we're not as prone to becoming completely insane like quite a few women are.</p>
<p>hahahaha!
my dear spanish-vulgarity <3'ing friend, tell that to the millions of men who, high off their testosterone, pummel the bejeezus out of the women who take care of them and the itty bitty children that they produced with those women.
tell that to the vast number of male serial killers on death row, then compare their numbers to that of female serial killers.</p>
<p>LAC, you ever watch the movie Equilibrium? You remind me of that.</p>
<p>This would be a pretty boring world if men didn't have something like sex motivating a lot of their thoughts and decisions, and the same can be said for women and emotions. We're the way that we are for a reason. I like how it is. Pursuing and 'getting' chicks is a challenge and, honestly, can be really fun.</p>
<p>false, i enjoy lots of things and my world is far from boring. i am constantly excited by things, but i don't let it get the best of me. such things involve not spending lots of time succumbing to primal urges.
i mean, i enjoy physical delights immensely, but ultimately i don't get sucked into them and swim in lala land for several hours when i could be doing things ultimately more productive.</p>
<p>Productivity is pretty relative, don't you think? I just want to do what I enjoy; to me, that's productive. If that's thinking about and pursuing women, that's what I'll do (hypothetically, as it isn't the only thing that's on my mind). I'm not going to resist these primal urges in favour of something deemed more productive by anyone else if it isn't something that I want to do. That wouldn't make any sense.</p>
<p>And about this "feeling sorry" for men... well, why feel sorry for people that are happy doing what they're doing?</p>
<p>well, that's a philosophical discussion.
if we have the ability to rationalize and think in ways that no other animal has been able to thus far, then it seems to me that our maximum potential as human beings will be reached by using that giant mass of stuff inside our craniums. chasing boys that my hormones and social conditioning say are physically appealing won't do that. thinking, reading, writing, thinking, etcetera will. if i don't maximize the potential of my brain, and no one else does with their own brains either, then our descendants will have maybe some different, improved physical attributes millions of years down the evolutionary path, but our brain development and our ability to think and rationalize will have ceased to develop. not exactly following the natural order that science has discovered and pointed towards thus far.
so it makes sense to me to do that. my duty, i guess. i also consider it my duty to convince other humans that we need to stop effing up our planet with pollution, or there won't be any life left and all my thinking, reading, writing, thinking attempts will have been in vain, aside from the personal enjoyment and fulfillment i find in them.</p>