<p>Apologies if I’m misunderstanding but if you are a NC resident, then tuition is about $7k a year? And if your parent is a professor at Pfeiffer is it possible you could live at home and commute, then the cost is either $7 or $14k for the extra years? Can your parents pick up the tab (as a professor it seems this might not be too unrealistic). Or would you really have to incur debt? I’m just trying to think around the obstacles rather than see it as an either/or choice. </p>
<p>The reason why is I really think you should look at taking longer. You will mature so much and get far far more out of your undergrad experience than just credits. It just seems a shame to rush through it so if money weren’t an issue I would think this would be worthwhile.</p>
<p>Also what are you looking for in graduate school? Is it to get a masters to boost your job prospects? Or to pursue a PhD? </p>
<p>When it comes to research experience, it isn’t the case of checking a box, “yup she did that, check!”. It’s also not about length. But about quality, which will be correlated with time. It takes time to find who you want to work with, what area you want to work in, and who will take you on. It takes time to learn the ropes in research and be given increasing responsibilities from demonstrating your abilities. </p>
<p>Quality of research experience varies tremendously but will make a big difference. At some schools or programs it won’t matter much; in some it will matter a lot. But a rule of thumb would be more important if hoping for a PhD (vs a terminal masters), mroe important in really competitive fields where everyone wants to go to graduate school, more important at high prestige research places. </p>
<p>It isn’t whether you say ‘you did it’ but rather what it involved. Quality of research experience. In the ideal fantasy world (not at all necessary but at one end of the continuum just to illustrate quality at the extreme end even though its rare) you end up with a a) publication in a b) well known journal with a c) famous professor (publications can take several years) at d) famous school, who says e) you walk on water, best student she or he has ever worked with. See fantasy. So not going to happen to anyone, but it anchors things a bit. Now you can move down the scale. </p>
<p>Maybe you don’t coauthor on a top publication but you publish in a lesser known B journal. Or an unknown journal. Or just a conference paper. Or just a working paper but you are still author. Or maybe you just get listed in the acknowledgements, a thank you for helping out in technical ways but you aren’t an author.</p>
<p>Maybe its not a famous person but a less famous person or a brand new faculty member or someone no one has heard of. Maybe they don’t even publish research. Maybe its not a well known school either. </p>
<p>Maybe you don’t get a wow best ever student I’ve ever worked with, but instead a really great person you must consider them, or just a well she or he was always on time sort of letter (though I rarely see those). </p>
<p>I realize this sounds overly simplistic, but I’m just trying to give you an example of what it means to get ‘research experience’ and how what that involves can take quite a bit of time to move up the quality ladder.</p>