<p>There was a thread earlier in the week asking the same question and a poster responded that he was on a Grad school interview committee and they would not even consider a student who spent only 2 years in undergrad. I will see if I can find the thread.</p>
<p>Here you go - <a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/parents-forum/608127-dual-enrollment-credits-impact-med-law-school-apps.html%5B/url%5D">http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/parents-forum/608127-dual-enrollment-credits-impact-med-law-school-apps.html</a> it was a thread about med/law school, but in post 5 Starbright posted the following response</p>
<p>
[quote]
Where are they entering college as juniors? Also, how many students do you know of specifically who have graduated in two years. The reason I ask these questions is I wonder if it's more of a theory that's out there, rather than a reality.</p>
<p>Though it's not law or med, on the grad school admissions committees I have sat, we would never consider someone who has only spent two years in an undergraduate college after highschool.</p>
<p>The reasons would be these. Their predicted age and maturity level would be a disadvantage (even if the prediction is inaccurate). There would be a question mark of whether they had enough time to know themselves, their real interests and best career goals for themselves.</p>
<p>As important, we might suspect they lack the values and perspective we are looking for. This is because it might appear that such candidates chose speed and quantity over experience, quality of education and development. That they viewed education like a commodity, a race, boxes to be checked off in an instrumental fashion, rather than as an experience, where one takes courses but also acquires wisdom, insight, critical thinking and development along the way. Education is so much more than what scores you get, and so much more goes on in the undergraduate yeras than earning credits.</p>
<p>Now I can think of some exceptions to what I'm saying about the time length. Like the truly high gifted who leave HS early and start university in their early to mid teens and finish early (I know some fantastic transition programs for such kids). Or those that manage to knock off a year in various ways. But what you are describing above, as a whole, creates a very different picture of a particularly different kind of student who comes across as more focused on 'getting it over with' than being intellectually curious.
[/quote]
</p>