Grinnell's president on the importance of liberal arts colleges

<p>Raynard</a> Kington: The Role of Liberal Arts Colleges in Advancing Positive Social Change</p>

<p>
[quote]
Our world desperately needs intelligent, passionate, engaged young people -- people who are educated in a way that equips and inspires them to change the world for the better. Liberal arts colleges have long embraced social justice within their academic missions and educational approaches. They prepare and celebrate graduates who work for non-profit organizations, educational institutions and government agencies, as well as those who infuse perspectives of positive social change in other settings such as the business world.</p>

<p>As a nation, we should treasure and support our liberal arts colleges, as they produce a disproportionate number of socially conscious innovators who have the capacity and motivation to change the world.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Thanks for sharing that, PRJ. I had not seen that.</p>

<p>Here’s another interesting take on what constitutes practical education for 21st century careers, from Cathy Davidson, the John Hope Franklin Humanities Institute Professor of Interdisciplinary Studies at Duke University:</p>

<p>"The twentieth century might well be defined as the century of standardization, efficiency, specialization, and certification. School and work, as we have inherited the terms, are all about standardization and about division of knowledge and certification of attainment of expertise in one area of knowledge. But that is not the world our children are inheriting in the 21st century. By one estimate, 65% of the jobs that will be available upon college graduation for students now entering high school (that’s eight years from now) do not yet exist. So we are preparing them as experts and as specialists for jobs we can’t even yet imagine? Are we making them experts in obsolescence? </p>

<p>"Doing well on standardized tests of existing knowledge is not a job skill; it is a checklist of facts many of which are fast becoming outmoded (or rendered irrelevant by Google). Standardized testing is not the apparatus for assessing logical abilities, inference, imagination, creativity, problem solving, project management, collaborative or communication skills, or the ability to retool oneself in the fact of enormous changes in one’s chosen profession or field. Facts. That is what standardized tests test. Or answers. Calculations. Those things may or may not be relevant to the future ways of working successfully together. Yet that skill at item-response testing is what the 20th century calls standards. Success at that form of standardized knowledge is what is necessary to get into college today. But doing well on standardized tests is not the skill you need to succeed in the workplace today. We have a mismatch. We are doing a good job training students for the twentieth century.</p>

<p>“With the Internet and the World Wide Web, no one is at the controls saying which information will go where. All information is bundled at the end point (my computer or, at most, my server) and then capable of being captured by any other end point (your computer), without a broadcaster, a publisher, an editor, a manager, a company, a foreman, or a CEO. This end-to-end principle requires collaborative skills, judgment and logical skills, synthesizing and analytical abilities, critical and creative skills, qualitative and quantitative skills, all together, with few lines between them. This end-to-end principle of the Internet and the World Wide Web have an impact on how we work, on how we communicate, on how we interact, on how we gather as citizens, on how we gather as global observers, on how we organize and how we disrupt organizations, on levels small or large.”</p>

<p>Actually most of the really useful business information is not available on the web as it is highly protected by those who originate it and sell it to other businesses. Much of what you can get for free is unfocused and useless. </p>

<p>Does Grinnell provide any placement data? I have heard it is horrible and a major area of complaint by students.</p>

<p>I’m pretty sure placement is not “horrible”, but the Career Services office has, IMO, been a weak link for several years. My guess is it will be vastly improved under Dr. Kington’s leadership… give him a little time - he has only been in office for seven months.</p>

<p>Cathy Davidson’s comments about standardized tests are not entirely true. There are a number of different standardized tests that test for problem-solving ability, such as the OLSAT or GogAt. Standardized testing itself is not the problem – it’s the levelest playing field we have for comparing students nationwide – but I’d prefer to see a reasoning-based exam supplant the more fact-based SAT and ACT.</p>

<p>Problem with SAT and ACT is that in regard to science and math they test mostly middle school/elementary school knowledge which is by far way too low and mislead lots of talented kids in regard to their level of background in these areas. Lots of them including very top kids have to go thru remedial services if they are stubborn enough about their chosen fields in science and engineering at college. However, most just fall out of track, which is very sad.
In regard to “educational” side vs proffesional goals at colleges, I warned my kid to stay away from any classes like that and more so from any informal discussion between students because most of these include high level of “brainwashing”. I have nothing agianst challenging classes in music, writing, art and others. However, in regard to placing certain values into kid’s head, it is up to familiies. I strongly disagree with what is going on at some top colleges and very happy that my kids did not choose to go there.</p>

<p>As a proud parent of a Grinnellian, I applaud Dr. Kington and the school. I am a liberal arts fan of the first order! I also am so impressed with how focused Grinnell College is on its sense of mission and purpose and how it focuses institutional resources on supporting those goals. </p>

<p>Regarding job placement, I believe they have a new director of the career center. </p>

<p>But, I firmly believe that education should prepare our students for a lifetime of learning and living, not just for what job they will get immediately upon graduation. These kids have the future in their hands; we need visionaries and activists, not just worker bees.</p>

<p>Also, Grinnell recently announced the Young Innovators for Social Justice Prize and specifically said that it would “make a special effort to seek nominations” in fields less traditionally associated with social change. “Areas of accomplishment may include, but are certainly not limited to: Science, Medicine, the Environment, Humanities, Business, Economics, Education, Law, Public Policy, Social Services, Religion, Ethics, and projects which cross these boundaries.”</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.grinnell.edu/offices/chaplain/socialjusticeprize/nominationcriteria[/url]”>http://www.grinnell.edu/offices/chaplain/socialjusticeprize/nominationcriteria&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>SDonCC,
You “need visionaries and activists”, please, do not speak for everybody else. If it is your choice, it is fine, but it does not have to be everybody’s goal. </p>

<p>“Education” could be accomplished outside of college, if there is a desire to do so. We are all educated thru our lives, if if we do not realize it. Some thru books, others thru their experience, third like listen to everybody else. Look at number of MD’s in government!!! Thank goodness they did not have “political science education” at college.</p>

<p>res ips loquitur, MiamiDAP.</p>

<p>^If you assume that I will understand you, you are incorrect.</p>

<p>Generalizations stated by the Perxy of Grinnell discounts the individual student at any university. As an OSU engineering undergrad I protested a war, tutored in the inner city and packed my nontech electives with sociology/humanities courses. As an adult I was arrested as a disarmament protester, worked as a Christian peacemaker/activist, served on community boards, and am still active in liberal politics as a retiree. Our son who attended RPI is similarly inclined as is many of his friends who attended non LACs.</p>

<p>I believe that the worldview of students is far more a product of the environment in which he/she is raised that the college attended.</p>

<p>Greal LAC colleges like Grinnell are largely attended by student whose families are attune to the mores of that instutition and thus resonate with the ethic of the President. Perhaps he does not see or appreciate that reality.</p>

<p>To me it is just marketing which should be applauded since everybody who is proud of his employer, should promote the place of employment. However, it is interesting to see that some are soaking up messages like this at face value. Should not we as “educated” individuals apply our critical thinking that we have developed during our college education that taught us to continue self-educating beyond college years? There is a contradiction in this thread.</p>

<p>I’m a big believer in liberals arts education, but this column got on my nerves a bit. Liberal education may contribute to “social change” but I’m suspicious of justifying this kind of intellectual training solely on the grounds of political or social effects. Also, the liberal arts will die if they perceived to be the pet interest of idealistic utopians.</p>

<p>By throwing out the old Arnoldian definition of culture as “the best that has been thought and said,” the supporters of liberal arts education did their cause a great disservice. Now the liberal arts are associated by many students with “oppression studies” and political activism only. That is not a positive development.</p>

<p>Placement from liberal arts colleges is almost irrelevant on the national scene, as fewer than 3% of all graduates come form liberal arts colleges. And for the past 25 years, accredited business schools have required both distributional requirements and number of courses outside of business classes stiffer than any liberal arts college in the nation.</p>

<p>I thought this was another interesting take on the role of education.
[Daniel</a> Luzer: The Danger of the “Practical” University](<a href=“HuffPost - Breaking News, U.S. and World News | HuffPost”>The Danger of the "Practical" University | HuffPost College)</p>

<p>^I like the last name of the author.</p>

<p>Posting in order to remind myself to return when I have more time this afternoon…</p>

<p>mini –
Do you have a source for that 3% number? I wonder how they define “liberal arts college”?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>That’s quite an expansive claim.</p>