@gibby
Hi there Gibby,
I’ve been following along with your comments entirely as a spectator for the better part of about seven months now and I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on what, if anything, it might mean to have logged somewhere in the area of twenty or so emails between an admissions officer and myself since having an on-campus interview with three different admissions officers, as well as a one on one with the director of admissions.
Is that worth reading into? As seems to be the case with most interviews, we touched upon my academic record (which I described as “unremarkable” only to be informed it was “very good”), but mostly engaged in musings about how much the area had changed since I was a kid (I grew up just over the bridge from the Harvard), and chit-chat about my travels (which admittedly are extensive). The entire engagement was both welcoming, and warm. It felt like I was catching up with old friends.
I had absolutely zero ambitions about hearing anything back from Harvard when I submitted my transfer application, and while I gave the application it’s due and proper, it would be dishonest to describe my approach to answering essays as anything more “from the hip.” So, while I have honestly accepted the statistical reality and feel totally at peace with the odds, I would be interested in hearing the take of a “senior member” who seems to be familiar with this conversation and the historical context on how transfers shake out.
What do ya say?
And cheers to the rest of you on here. I admire each of you for putting your chips in. For those of you having trouble with the wait, you might consider what is at stake here. The admissions committee might well be deciding on one of YOUR applications…if I were you (and I am), I might take comfort in the fact that the most careful considerations are being given. Nobody owes us anything, and transfers are the very last lot of about 40,000 applications submitted over a considerably short timespan. Good luck!