“While I appreciate your POV @PurpleTitan there’s more to school that stats that you cite. The environment for one, as I’ve pointed out. And the style and panache, which shouldn’t be taken lightly. More, there’s fit to personality.”
That’s all very true, and fit matters in selecting a school, but I don’t think it serves anyone well to think that there’s some magical fairy dust that propels those who attend Columbia (or even Harvard) more than those who attend Duke.
"Duke is a wonderful school, and competent, but the magic and opportunity in so many fields, plus the shear experience of being exposed to so many opportunities, it just can’t compare, IMHO. "
Oh, nevermind, you do believe in magical fairy dust after all.
OK, so answer me this: Of what worth is all that magic and opportunity at Columbia and if the “shear (sic) experience of being exposed to so many opportunities” doesn’t compare at Duke, then why are there more high-achieving Duke grads than there are high-achieving Columbia grads? How are Duke grads getting ahead with the puny amount of opportunities that they have?
“Duke is a competent school . . .and does not compare”.
Indeed, so competent that by literally every metric you may care to pull up (other than, perhaps, magical fairy dust), Duke is solidly in the middle of the Ivies (at least has some Ivies below it). And if you are not comparing by metrics that may be found, then by what are you comparing by? Magical fairy dust?
The snobbery just astounds.