<p>
[quote]
Claremont is too far out to even be considered part of the city or county of LA.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Claremont is in LA County (though very near the San Bernardino line). I second the rest of liek's characterization of the area. DunninLA's version was not really my experience, but I suppose that sleepy is in the eye of the beholder. Opinions re: the town of Claremont definitely do vary.</p>
<p>OP: Check [here[/url</a>] for a brief description of the Claremont consortium.</p>
<p>Pomona</p>
<ul>
<li>Very residential campus. Largest single campus of the consortium, but still pretty small as college campuses go. More of an east coast feel than is typical of a CA school. Consistently shows up on "Most Attractive Campuses"-type lists. Not enough overall uniformity for my tastes, but lots of "nooks and crannies," some beautiful interiors (Frary dining hall, Little Bridges auditorium), and tons of green space. Very strong life sciences. Bio is one of the most popular majors.</li>
</ul>
<p>[url=<a href="http://i.cnn.net/money/galleries/2007/moneymag/0707/gallery.BPTL_top_100.moneymag/images/claremont_ca.jpg%5DPomona">http://i.cnn.net/money/galleries/2007/moneymag/0707/gallery.BPTL_top_100.moneymag/images/claremont_ca.jpg]Pomona</a> #1](<a href="http://www.claremont.edu%5Dhere%5B/url">http://www.claremont.edu)
Pomona</a> #2</p>
<p>CMC</p>
<ul>
<li>Same location as above. CMC's own campus is smaller, but the overall consortium campus size is the same for all of the colleges. Pretty basic architecture and appearance. Gets criticized as "60's apartment complex," but I never minded it. Feels clean, functional, not especially beautiful or unattractive. Shares a science program with Scripps and Pitzer. Very strong. Sciences aren't generally thought of as the school's focus, but bio is one of the most popular majors.</li>
</ul>
<p>Joint</a> Science Department of the Claremont Colleges</p>
<p>CMC</a> #1
CMC</a> #2</p>
<p>Mudd</p>
<ul>
<li>Same location as above. Mudd's campus is the smallest of the three, but again, the overall consortium size is the same. Very uniform architecture. Sometimes called "dated", "functional", "Lego-like", or "typical of a tech school." Often shows up on "Least Attractive Campuses"-type lists. Personally, I was never awed by the school's beauty, but I didn't mind it, either. It's well-maintained, nicely landscaped, and the buildings are very consistent. Mudd is a math/science/engineering college. I'd only recommend it if you're sure that you want to go into those fields, and even then, I'd refer you to some other threads if bio or med school was your likeliest goal. Mudd's sciences are fantastic, but those are two fields I often see disclaimed.</li>
</ul>
<p>Mudd</a> #1
Mudd</a> #2</p>
<p>Oxy</p>
<ul>
<li>Spent much less time here. More urban feel, fun area (seemed like there were lots of food options, places to study near campus, etc.). "West coast" feel to the architecture. Clean, uniform, attractive in a California way. Vaguely similar feel to Pomona, architecturally speaking. Don't know about the science program, but didn't find any listed among most popular majors (didn't spend long looking, and regardless, that in itself doesn't necessarily mean anything).</li>
</ul>
<p>Oxy</a> #1
Oxy</a> #2</p>
<p>You can find far more (and probably less) attractive photos of all of the above, and on a nice day in SoCal, pretty much anything looks more beautiful than photographs convey. I just did chose a few photos that seemed more or less representative.</p>
<p>See [url=<a href="http://www.cuc.claremont.edu/maps/flat_bw_map.pdf%5Dhere%5B/url">http://www.cuc.claremont.edu/maps/flat_bw_map.pdf]here[/url</a>] for a map of all the Claremont campuses. Shows you their relative size + how close they really are (adjacent). Mudd is along the top, CMC is in the middle, and Pomona is at the bottom.</p>
<p>Good luck :)</p>