<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am currently a freshman undergraduate student at a fairly low cost college, I believe the full years estimate is around 18k (tuition, room and board ect..)</p>
<p>-My family efc was ~5600
-I received $0 in grants, shouldn't be gpa related (had a 3.9)
-Was not offered work study
-My school awarded me $5,500 in loans for the entire year, 3.5 sub as is the limit.
-I was denied for my parent plus loan, which I was told would increase my stafford unsub limit increasing my maximum first year borrowing limit to 9.5k (still 3.5 sub).</p>
<p>But my school is not awarding me the 4K stafford limit increase and insisting that they do not have to, I understand that it may very well be in their rights to disperse funds as they see fit but I believe that they are making an error.</p>
<p>-18k for the year = 9k per semester</p>
<p>-5,500 in loans for the year = 2750 per semester
-<6000 in family efc = Lets even round up and say 3000 per semester.
-Was not offered work study of any kind, although I do have a minor weekend/night job.</p>
<p>This leaves me $3,250 short for each semester and 6,500 short for the year. So that additional 4,000 stafford limit increase would go a LONG way, I would even be able to save up from my job earnings and cover the rest by the end of the year (almost).</p>
<p>So my question is how are they really acting reasonably (or at least normally) when they leave me underfunded for the year even though on staffords site it says that a parent plus denial results in immediate increase of loan limit?</p>