@Vincent1997 : This
" Emory: This school seems like an odd-ball to me. They have awesome rankings, yet I have read more negative than positive things about the school. Things such as the University “falsifying” statistics and students not enjoying the University. Also, I have never heard anyone talk about it… ever. Is it worth going to a school that nobody seems to know?"
Is not asking questions. That is being immediately dismissive and shady (I don’t see how you are in a position to do this). Oddly, many of the ED1 candidates have found plenty to like or have “heard” plenty of things to like about Emory beyond rankings, yet YOU highlight NONE of that. Instead you bring up irrelevant stuff that has literally nothing to do with the quality of education you will receive. Most admissions offices are not particularly ethical/great actors yet their activities do not effect what goes on in campus life or in the classroom. If you are worried about what you heard, there is more research you can do on your own part if you are actually serious about finding things good about each option.
You may start with Emory’s website:
http://www.emory.edu/home/index.html
Also, who gives a damn if “no one” (who are you defining as “somebody”?..I don’t know, employers seem to like it and they seem like pretty important people, maybe I’m wrong…you do want a job right) talks about it when the students are well-paid and hired, especially those coming from the business school: https://goizueta.emory.edu/degree/undergraduate/index.html
Poets and Quant features Emory an awful lot
Emory academics contribute to the news (major publications) or make it into the conversation an awful lot much like any elite school:
http://news.emory.edu/press/more_in_the_news.html
If you seriously don’t want to try to find something good to say…just do not say anything at all.
Also, you may go to P and Q and much stuff is mentioned about Notre Dame and features of its program…you really aren’t trying hard enough. It almost seems as if you are ill-informed or already have biases that you want confirmed. I say drop those, and go to the schools’ websites and investigate the features you want in a business school or overall university in terms of your personal and professional development instead of dwelling on pettiness and “what you have heard” about things that will not effect it on the internet. Go back and read you initial post and realize how shallow a lot of it was…there was literally no serious question especially in the Emory part:
“Also, I have never heard anyone talk about it… ever. Is it worth going to a school that nobody seems to know?”
This isn’t a question, this borderline an attack.
Also the BEST possible outcome is not necessarily a WS IB…sorry, that is only your opinion. And from what place it is coming from, I don’t know. If you become competitive for whatever, then you are competitive for it. YOU have to become competitive. These schools aren’t going to perform magic. Not about how WS views them so much as how they view the candidates as individuals. I suggest you take that approach no matter where you go among these. None of them are like CalState so that statement was irrelevant…they are all way above it. If you don’t land wherever at whichever one you attend. You either stumbled upon bad luck or simply were not competitive. Period. Differentiating between them in that realm is a waste of time. Worry about how you will pursue your education, intern, and gain leadership positions on whichever campus instead of “popularity” and “prestige”. There is plenty of information on each programs’s website that market different academic programs, ECs, and professional development opportunities. YOU can go look them up.