<p>di,
If you find national rankings in the 200s to be evidence of teams that are legit, then I guess we have different standards. Also, do you realize that only 1 Ivy mens basketball team even had a winning record last year? </p>
<p>Anyway, in the realm that I most care about, which is the scene that surrounds the athletic events and how that positively impacts the college’s campus, I think that the gap is even larger between the Ivies and most of the colleges in my Dream Conference. </p>
<p>Corbett,
I think you’re right that the so-called Magnolia League makes for a much more realistic scenario even if we know it will never happen. </p>
<p>One more creative alternative might be to take out the schools furthest away (Stanford, USC, Rice, Northwestern) and replace them with Army, Navy, Georgetown and a one more to be named to complete an 8-team conference. Then you’d be left with:</p>
<p>Duke
Vanderbilt
Notre Dame
Georgetown
Wake Forest
Army
Navy </p>
<p>Possibilities for the eighth spot: Boston College, Tulane, Davidson</p>
<p>The folks in academia may not like such a grouping compared to the Ivies, but for those in the business world, I would argue that this is an equally attractive grouping of colleges. </p>
<p>RML,
I guess prestige is in the eye of the beholder. Remember, prestige is mostly a regional thing where the local State U often has a higher regard in its region than more highly ranked, faraway competitors. For many folks who live in the South, Vanderbilt has more attraction than the non-HYP Ivies. And with the sharp improvements at that school over the last decade, their student quality is now at/near the same level. Same could be said about USC. </p>
<p>confusedboy,
I think you make a good argument for schools that would mostly be appropriate athletic matches for the Ivies, although I think that Stanford and Duke would run roughshod over the Ivies and the others, particularly in the major sports of football, mens and womens basketball, and baseball.</p>