<p>What stands out to me the most in that NYT article is Martin Charnin saying there’s no difference between Equity and non-Equity. I think that’s the real problem: the fact that non-union tours are only non-union for the ACTORS. They can still use Broadway directors, choreographers, and other creatives like Martin Charnin, and they call it a “Broadway tour” and charge Broadway prices. I don’t think that’s fair. I think there should be solidarity among Broadway professionals: if you’re not using Equity actors, you shouldn’t be able to use Broadway ANYTHING or ANYONE.</p>
<p>Now, let me be clear: I’m NOT saying non-Equity shows shouldn’t exist. It’s fine that they do, and it’s a good way for actors to start building credits before they’re Equity. I’m just saying that there should be a VERY clear demarcation between Equity tours and non-Equity. The Equity tours should be the ones called “Broadway tour” and using the Broadway creative team and charging the Broadway prices. JMO!</p>