<p>Apples cannot be compared to oranges here. One should
(1) first examine the State as a whole, if State funding and State bureaucracy is a considerable feature dictating how public schools are run. I only know intimately about my own State, for example.
(2) second, look to compare a private and a public with similar income levels among the families. Otherwise, the comparison will be way off. Well-funded local districts with high property taxes tend to have better public resources.
(3) When one finds a comparable pair such as #2, such as I can find (many, many cases), I can generalize thus:</p>
<p>The best public school in my region has, by definition, way more bureaucracy than the worst private school. So hey, if you like bureaucracy, go for it. :rolleyes: Personally, I’d rather leave the bureaucrats to the IRS and the SSA than to my own children. </p>
<h1>1 -With bureaucracy comes rigidity, depending on the complexity of the bureaucracy. Thus, using as an example one of the best publics with high-income families, compared to a private with similar academics and income level: Which would you want, a system that requires the CP-level exact course to be completed, in all cases, before the AP of that course is attempted, and I do mean for each course. No skipping, no substitution, despite proven achievement & ability, despite results of placement tests, yadayada. For every student at said public, this means that about half the number of AP courses will be completed as by a similar student in a private, even though there are as many AP offerings in this public as in the private.</h1>
<h1>2 - generally wider diversity in student body composition at the private than the public, assuming an ethnically diverse geographical location to begin with. The best publics in my area are far more homogeneous than the best privates. More homogeneous in income and in race/ethnicity. It’s amazing how I’ve seen that translate into college lists. The kids from the privates automatically assume economic & racial diversity to be a necessary element of any college on their list. That is not necessarily a given at the publics. (sometimes yes, but often not.)</h1>
<h1>3 - Personal attention, with regard to academic guidance (course selection, course sequence) is potentially way better in the privates. That said, again, it’s important to compare apples to apples. There are some very large Catholic schools in my area which are similar in reduced individual attention to the best publics.</h1>
<h1>4 - Assuming a manageable size student body, the on-site college counseling WILL be better in a private than “the best” public. And the administrative staff speaks to each other non-bureaucratically. Thus, academic dean at the private (another luxury many publics do not have) actually speaks to the college counselor at that private, to plan Star Student X’s program from 9th through 12th so as to assure terrific college results.</h1>
<h1>5 - The corresponding aspect to #1 is that with flexibility in a private comes individual attention, even Independent Study in certain course areas, and even tailoring a course for a handful of students, including offering AP classes to tiny handfuls of students. And because the scheduling can be made so flexible, a student can pursue an Honors or AP class as an Independent Study in order to complete other desirable aspects of his or her program, as well as continue special extracurriculars that may only be held at certain times. (Or, the teacher for that one special AP may only be available at certain times relative to a student’s schedule; that will all be worked around in a private with a manageable student body; not so at a public.) In general, students at “best” publics have a maximum number of classes they can take during any semester or quarter; that number is variable at many privates.</h1>