How scary is it to read this:

<p><from http:="" www.dailyprincetonian.com="" archives="" 2000="" 12="" 11="" news="" 2019.shtml=""></from></p>

<p>With so many variables to be considered within the short period available for reviewing Early Decision applicants, the process by which the admission office admits prospective students has been crafted to be as expedient as possible.</p>

<pre><code>That process has two principle components.

First, the support staff "preps" an application — consolidating the critical academic and extracurricular information about each prospective student onto a two-sided, thick, canary-yellow form.

And from that small card, the process continues.

The front lists all the necessary biographical and academic information — name, address, classes taken, unweighted GPA recalculated by the office and SAT and AP test scores, among other things.

On the back, admission deans remark on and evaluate the less rigid elements of the application. At the top of the page, one box lists extracurricular activities, another notes legacy status. Further down, each of the four essay questions has a line for deans' reactions.

There is also a space at the bottom reserved for readers to jot down their general impressions of the candidate.

The actual application reading process resembles a relay race, as each applicant's folder is passed to subsequent readers like a baton.

One of the four associate deans leads off the process by skimming the application to assign the student two numerical grades.

Using a rating scale ranging from one to five — one representing the best — the associate dean evaluates the applicant for both academic and non-academic achievement.

A junior officer, another associate dean and the dean of admission run subsequent legs of the race, reading the applications and jotting down impressions on the yellow card.

Acting Dean of Admission Steven LeMenager estimated that the three readers combined spend about one hour reading and evaluating each 12-page application.

"The first reader might take 30 to 45 minutes to read the application through, and the second and third readers would take less than that. It might be 15, 10 or 20 minutes, it just depends," LeMenager said.

And with about 1,850 early decision candidates this year, that adds up to about 2,000 hours of work during a six-week period for the University's 13 admission officers.

The procedure occurs entirely on paper, with associate deans voicing their opinions in a few paragraphs of writing with hardly a word exchanged verbally.

And for every Early Decision applicant, LeMenager makes the final decision. About 45 percent of the Class of 2005 will be determined through this process.

LeMenager said he believes having one person responsible for all the decisions — though stressful and time-consuming — provides a degree of accountability in the admission process.

"I am the arbiter, but it's not a conversation. It's up to the dean to make the final determination," LeMenager said. "It's a lot of work for the dean's office, but that is the process decided on by the trustees and faculty."
</code></pre>

<p>thankfully, it goes to committee now.</p>

<p>i am a two-sided, thick, canary-yellow form.
at least its not an index card</p>

<p>oh you sure about that ilcapo? how do you know? i think that's better too</p>

<p>adcom: best job ever</p>

<p>yea about that recalculating gpa thing... i think i might be screwed over by a couple b+'s junior year (damn frosh and soph were two of my best years too)</p>

<p>enco - </p>

<p>i read somewhere in the princetonian that the new dean of admissions did away with the dean hargedon custom and established a committee.</p>

<p><a href="http://dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2004/04/28/sports/10443.shtml%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2004/04/28/sports/10443.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>there ya go ilcapo</p>

<p>"Coaches get to recommend people in the same way that the different academic departments do," Cross said.</p>

<p>Since when do different academic departments get to make recommendations? As if the geology department was really given the same authority as the football coach.</p>

<p>What was the dean haragdon custom?</p>

<p>do they recalculate the GPA now based on weighted or unweighted grades?</p>

<p>dean hargadon was the final decision maker on every applicant. even if 10 readers said admit, he could still deny them. thats why they used to call it "hargadon's class", because everyone was picked and chosen on purpose to craft a well rounded group of students. of course he recieved great criticisms for ignoring artists, musicians, dramatists, etc.</p>

<p>It's sad that at least four years of our lives get evaluated in less than an hour. The entire admissions process scares me. Does anyone know what else is different with the new dean?</p>

<p>ahh good thing we don't have hargadon anymore...he really creeped me out.</p>

<p>viogirl, that article up there... <a href="http://dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2004/04/28/sports/10443.shtml%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2004/04/28/sports/10443.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>I dunno zant, from what I've read of him he seemed nice and eccentric</p>

<p>WFT happened to recommendations in that process?! Those really help me! </p>

<pre><code> my recs>>>>my essays!
</code></pre>

<p>About departments recommending students......the head of the dance dept said she'd write me a rec letter, so it does happen, who knows how much weight they give it, but it isn't only sports teams giving reccomendations</p>

<p>well the art department said the same thing but......</p>

<p>Pssst. Here's a well known, and not-so-secret secret: That's what art supplement submissions are for. The various departments recommend the applicant portfolios they like best.</p>

<p>yes, but i mean, they arent really an academic department. in fact, there is no fine arts major at princeton. nor is there a dance major.</p>