<p>First, what you said made no sense. Israel has long lost on their international relations. When millions of Arab children are taught to hate Jews, there is no point in winning a few skirmish, there will just be another wave of extremism/terrorists willing to replace those killed. The most logical choice is to take these hate groups out of the spotlight as soon as possible. </p>
<p>But, most importantly, do you have any idea of the innocent civilians being killed (on both sides) for no reason?!? These are people. These are brothers and sisters and mothers and fathers. Gone, forever. These are babies and children and teenagers and men and women. </p>
<p>God, I can't talk to you anymore. It's like talking to a wall.</p>
<p>What dont you understand...lose/lose means do what the hell you came to do because none of it matters anyway</p>
<p>hahah, you advocate pulling out of the fight yet you are discouraged because people are being killed on both sides, when even after Israel pulls out, **** is still gonna continue....Israel needs to re-evaluate their strategy (maybe some ****ing infantry for once?) and take out who they came to take out</p>
<p>Yeah, so in your opinion, Israel should just do what they want as long as they want, keep killing, keep recklessly bombing (including a U.N. control tower, I mean, what the ***?) because, in your opinion, who cares, it's gonna happen anyway, and it won't matter, I mean Israel will just suffocate the only democratic hope for the region because, in your opinon, it's lose-lose.</p>
<p>Keeping with this same logic, people should just keep killing anyway because it will happen anyway, I mean we all die anyway? So I could just shoot someone because that person's gonna die anyway, right, and that would be okay, according to you, right?</p>
<p>Ohmygosh you are an idiot, you are so stupid, you are so stupid. I'm just glad you're not our president or anything...</p>
<p>ah, but you see i put some little words in there that said "change strategy" their current one sucks...their afraid to send in infantry because they think the terrorists can rack up high casualty rates on em....I mean, we're talking one of the best infantries in the world here....right now bombing isnt doing anything but killing civilians, i agree...but going in there on the ground may change</p>
<p>why'd they even go in the first place? everything can be argued...im just stating my opinion. You dont sound like your even in hs yet?</p>
<p>You know, Ferst, if I ever decided to become a crack dealer or serial killer, I'll call you to be my defense lawyer. I can just see you saying "What? That person was gonna die anyway." or "Oh, that guy? He was gonna die too"</p>
<p>Actually, Israel is afraid to send in infantry because that would be just a repeat of 2000...or 1983...and no one wants to repeat those failures, right? Also, they know they would get bogged down and reak of war, and airstrikes are quick and easy, bomb 'em and go, you don't have to see anyone's crying faces or mangled bodies, right? </p>
<p>"one of the best infantries in the world"</p>
<p>hah. someone pass me the whiskey.</p>
<p>then, you ask "why'd they even go in there in the first place?" </p>
<p>why the hell are you arguing with me then ...arghhh forget it</p>
<p>You cant apply logic for a quasi-war with endless years of underlying tension to drug dealing. Just like you cant do vise versa...why, what would you do? Throw the nation of Isreal in jail for a few then subject them to rehab and counseling? Please, you're too young to be arguing about this anyway</p>
<p>100 years from now it will be more about who followed GW, than GW himself. 100 years from now what will the environment look like? What will the population be? How will energy power our things? </p>
<p>In the years to come after GW and the gop held branches of power, things will either begin to change dramatically or continue on. GW's footnote in history will be the incursion into Iraq without cause, his evironmental policies and social (read: religous) policies that slowed down advancement in medicines and cures for certain illness because they conflicted with his personal religous doctrines.</p>